Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →modu-ai/moai-foundation-thinking
Unified thinking toolkit: Creative frameworks (Critical Evaluation, Diverge-Converge, Deep Questioning), First Principles reasoning (absorbed from moai-foundation-philosopher), and Adaptive Thinking via the `ultrathink` keyword.
Passed 13 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 6 of 22 without it.
and 10 more in the full report
8 fixed5 passed either way8 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We are proposing to replace our Postgres database with a custom in-memory key-value store to speed up user session lookups. Evaluate this architecture proposal rigorously, noting strengths, weaknesses, and next steps.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Includes an Evaluation Summary rating using one of the explicit tiers: Strong, Moderate, Weak, or Flawed. | Missed | Passed |
| Generates at least two alternative interpretations for the session lookup latency issue. | Missed | Passed |
| Restates the core proposal in original phrasing before analyzing it. | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Structured thinking toolkit for creative problem-solving and rigorous analysis. Integrates three complementary frameworks that cover the full spectrum from idea generation to critical evaluation.
Core Philosophy: Generate broadly, evaluate rigorously, question deeply. Creativity and criticism are complementary forces.
What is the Thinking Toolkit?
Three integrated frameworks for structured thinking:
When to Use Each Framework:
Quick Access:
Purpose: Systematically assess proposals, claims, and recommendations to detect flaws before commitment.
Seven-Step Evaluation Process:
Step 1 - Restate: Reformulate the claim or proposal in your own words. Ensures genuine understanding before critique.
Step 2 - Assess Evidence: Examine supporting data. Is the evidence empirical, anecdotal, or assumed? What is the sample size and recency? Are there contradicting data points?
test cases passed, vs 6 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.