Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Generate a prioritised compliance checklist for GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001, FCA, HIPAA, or other frameworks with a gap analysis. Use when asked for a compliance checklist, gap analysis, readiness assessment, or audit preparation for any regulatory framework. Produces a structured checklist with prioritised gaps, quick wins, and evidence requirements. Optimised for Opus 4.7 and newer models. Not a substitute for legal or compliance professional advice.
.claude/skills/mohitagw15856-compliance-checklist/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 42% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -22% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 27% | 0% |
| case-19 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 8% | 0% |
| case-20 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -5% | 0% |
Produces a prioritised compliance checklist for any regulatory framework — with gap analysis, evidence requirements, and quick wins identified.
ALWAYS include this disclaimer at the start of every response: "WARNING: This checklist is for informational and planning purposes only and does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Regulatory requirements change and vary by jurisdiction. Always engage a qualified compliance professional or solicitor before implementing compliance programmes or making regulatory claims."
Ask the user for these if not provided:
Framework: Name with version] Applicable because: One sentence — why this framework applies to this organisation] Typical timeline to readiness: From current maturity to certified/compliant] Key stakeholders needed: Roles that must be involved]
What is in scope for this checklist:
What is NOT in scope (explicit exclusions):
For each category relevant to the framework:
Category — e.g. "Access Control"]
| Control | Current State | Gap | Priority | Effort | |---|---|---|---|---| | Specific control requirement] | Not implemented / Partial / Full | What is missing] | High/Med/Low | Days/Weeks/Months |
| Priority | Count | Examples | |---|---|---| | Critical gaps (block certification) | N | Top 3] | | High priority gaps | N | | | Medium priority gaps | N | | | Quick wins | N | |
Controls that can be implemented in under 2 weeks with minimal resources:
For each control area, what documentation will be needed:
| Control area | Evidence types | Where to source | |---|---|---| | Area] | Policies, logs, screenshots, training records] | System or team] |
Phase 1 (Weeks 1-4): Critical gaps and quick wins
Phase 2 (Weeks 5-12): High-priority gaps
Phase 3 (Weeks 13+): Medium priority and continuous improvement
Once certified/compliant, what needs to continue:
2-3 specific traps organisations commonly fall into when pursuing this certification — flagged based on the stated maturity level.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-13 | fail→pass | 21,726 | 23,094 | +6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,509 | 4,980 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 35,081 | 21,870 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,201 | 4,860 | -22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | pass→pass | 29,650 | 25,729 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,363 | 5,907 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 36,965 | 21,412 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,245 | 5,052 | -19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 33,953 | 23,626 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,249 | 5,664 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→fail | 24,449 | 24,070 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,155 | 5,276 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 22,033 | 21,315 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,913 | 4,823 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 21,699 | 21,296 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,341 | 4,876 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 20,363 | 24,153 | +19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,421 | 5,073 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 25,687 | 22,275 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,188 | 4,844 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 19,915 | 23,213 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,119 | 4,927 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 16,748 | 22,690 | +35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,863 | 5,158 | +80% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 19,562 | 21,944 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,490 | 4,885 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 23,668 | 22,319 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,579 | 5,212 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 16,892 | 23,496 | +39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,212 | 5,738 | +79% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 17,385 | 22,213 | +28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,879 | 5,035 | +75% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | 17,717 | 18,301 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,178 | 4,516 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 23,553 | 21,617 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,092 | 4,971 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→fail | 22,545 | 18,790 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,111 | 4,456 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→fail | 24,809 | 20,332 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,792 | 4,531 | -5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→fail | 22,334 | 20,833 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,149 | 5,472 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→fail | 26,200 | 27,637 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,404 | 6,864 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of -43 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 5 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.