Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Size an emergency fund from essential spend and real risk factors — not a one-size 'six months' — with the funding timeline and where the money should sit. Use when asked how big should my emergency fund be, do I have enough saved, emergency fund or invest, or how many months of expenses do I need. Produces the risk-adjusted target from the script, the essential-spend worksheet, the funding plan, and the what-counts-as-an-emergency rules.
.claude/skills/mohitagw15856-emergency-fund/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -10% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 18% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -4% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 29% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 26% | 0% |
"Six months of expenses" is a slogan wearing a decimal — the real number depends on which expenses (essential, not total) and which risks (one income or two, steady or variable, how fast the job replaces itself). This skill computes the target from those inputs, builds the funding timeline, and writes the two rule-sets that make a fund work in practice: what counts as an emergency, and when to stop adding to the fund and start investing the surplus.
Ask for these if not provided:
bashpython3 scripts/emergency_fund.py --essentials 3400 --saved 4000 --monthly-save 500 python3 scripts/emergency_fund.py --essentials 3400 --saved 4000 --monthly-save 500 --single-income --variable-income --json
Deterministic: base 3 months + 1 (single income) + 2 (variable income) + 1 (dependents) + 1 (niche job market), capped by honesty — the flags are the risk conversation made explicit.
Script output: months, adders, target, gap, months-covered-today, timeline]
| Category | Monthly | Notes | |---|---|---| The emergency-mode number, line by line]
Monthly rate → completion date · what pauses contributions (a real emergency) vs. what doesn't (a sale) · the starter-fund sequencing if high-interest debt exists]
It's an emergency if: involuntary, necessary, unexpected — all three. The fund is full when: target] — after that, the same transfer redirects to next goal], because past-target "safety" is just uninvested money.
Educational model, not financial advice — verify with a licensed professional before acting on it.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 25,903 | 16,941 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,537 | 4,100 | -10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 21,524 | 16,743 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,611 | 4,248 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 19,488 | 17,001 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,600 | 3,469 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 12,088 | 9,396 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,096 | 2,703 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 14,737 | 14,806 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,475 | 3,365 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 7,327 | 9,506 | +30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,420 | 2,958 | +108% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 12,072 | 9,057 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,189 | 2,765 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 8,236 | 9,605 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,391 | 2,765 | +99% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 9,929 | 12,854 | +29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,825 | 3,308 | +81% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 10,892 | 9,150 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,812 | 2,317 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 9,400 | 8,626 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,604 | 2,427 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 11,363 | 12,586 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,861 | 3,099 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 9,009 | 8,175 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,598 | 2,385 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 10,109 | 8,541 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,784 | 2,395 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→fail | 10,744 | 10,978 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,977 | 3,113 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 16,557 | 15,762 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,737 | 3,826 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 10,080 | 15,036 | +49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,552 | 2,690 | +73% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 9,849 | 10,245 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,585 | 2,716 | +71% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 9,808 | 10,491 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,465 | 2,836 | +94% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 11,683 | 9,075 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,869 | 2,666 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 11,768 | 14,982 | +27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,973 | 3,503 | +78% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 12,423 | 13,471 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,077 | 3,218 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +41 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.