Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Appeal a denied insurance claim — read the real reason for the denial, find the strongest grounds, and draft the appeal with the evidence that answers it. Use when asked to appeal a denied claim, my insurance claim was rejected, the insurer won't pay, or how do I fight a claim denial. Produces a decode of the denial reason, the best grounds to appeal on, a structured appeal letter citing your policy, the evidence checklist, deadlines to watch, and the external-review/ombudsman escalation. Not le
.claude/skills/mohitagw15856-insurance-claim-appeal/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 55% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 59% | 0% |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 62% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 54% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 50% | 0% |
A denial is often a first offer, not a verdict. Insurers deny for specific, stated reasons — "not medically necessary," "pre-existing," "outside coverage," "insufficient documentation" — and a large share get overturned on appeal when the claimant answers that exact reason with the right evidence and cites their own policy back. This decodes the denial, picks the strongest grounds, and writes the appeal — while being clear it's a preparation aid, not regulated advice.
Ask for these if not provided:
What the denial really means: plain-English decode] — to overturn it you must show X].
Strongest grounds: coverage misread / documentation gap / error / medical-necessity / procedural].
Appeal letter > Claim #, policy section cited, the denial reason addressed head-on, the evidence that answers it, the specific outcome requested — reconsider and pay]
Evidence to attach: the exact records/letters that rebut the stated reason]
Deadlines: internal appeal by date] · external review window if known].
If the internal appeal fails: independent/external review → ombudsman/regulator → consider professional advice].
Note: preparation aid, not legal or regulated financial advice — for high-value or complex denials, consider a licensed adviser.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 27,078 | 30,385 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,441 | 4,661 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 31,897 | 24,736 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,556 | 4,037 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 26,030 | 22,574 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,900 | 4,149 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 17,573 | 19,449 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,147 | 3,297 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 15,927 | 16,449 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,909 | 2,857 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 22,562 | 22,358 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,952 | 4,588 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 19,242 | 18,953 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,531 | 3,580 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 15,904 | 12,990 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,126 | 3,391 | +60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 19,601 | 17,187 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,492 | 3,861 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 19,726 | 21,382 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,601 | 4,017 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 16,154 | 13,544 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,781 | 3,485 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 14,738 | 20,553 | +39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,560 | 3,655 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | 17,921 | 13,008 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,173 | 3,300 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 12,367 | 19,393 | +57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,347 | 3,723 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 16,292 | 16,766 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,000 | 3,288 | +64% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 16,574 | 17,508 | +6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,231 | 3,385 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 20,109 | 20,194 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,696 | 3,675 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 16,962 | 21,887 | +29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,297 | 3,617 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 10,182 | 16,066 | +58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,910 | 3,015 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 16,525 | 21,149 | +28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,615 | 4,236 | +62% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 16,328 | 19,480 | +19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,313 | 3,170 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 23,607 | 22,319 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,635 | 4,085 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +14 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.