Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Cut through passive-income hype to what's actually realistic for you — the real effort, capital, and risk behind each option, and which (if any) fit your situation. Use when asked how do I make passive income, is passive income real, best passive income ideas, or help me build income streams. Produces an honest teardown of the popular passive-income options (what they really require, how 'passive' they actually are, typical returns and risks), a match to your capital/skills/time, the scams and g
.claude/skills/mohitagw15856-passive-income-reality-check/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 17% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 32% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 20% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 72% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 9% | 0% |
"Passive income" is the internet's favorite fantasy — most of what's sold as passive is either a job in disguise, requires serious capital, or is a course selling you the dream. This gives the honest version: what each popular option actually requires (effort, money, risk), how passive it really is, and which — if any — fit your situation. The goal is a realistic path, not another rabbit hole. Not financial advice.
Ask for these if not provided:
The options, honestly | Option | Really needs | How passive | Real risk/return | |---|---|---|---| | dividends/investing · rentals · digital products · content · lending · business] | | | |
Fits you: the realistic options given your resources]. Avoid: get-rich-quick courses · "passive income" gurus · anything promising easy returns. Grounded next step: most realistic option + a small way to test it].
> Not financial advice. Returns and risks vary; most "passive" income requires real upfront work or capital. Test small before committing.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | pass→pass | 27,824 | 26,107 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,576 | 3,894 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→fail | 34,651 | 33,174 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,987 | 4,786 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 45,239 | 26,082 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,088 | 4,125 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 19,892 | 38,742 | +95% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,644 | 5,720 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 27,978 | 23,430 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,912 | 3,957 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 29,032 | 32,002 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,195 | 4,039 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 17,115 | 17,682 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,434 | 2,837 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 15,110 | 105,832 | +600% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,588 | 3,416 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 27,715 | 23,807 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,041 | 3,936 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 18,288 | 23,107 | +26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,955 | 3,357 | +72% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 24,965 | 35,920 | +44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,719 | 3,523 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 19,703 | 40,086 | +103% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,059 | 3,293 | +60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 17,027 | 22,926 | +35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,532 | 3,735 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→fail | 20,869 | 23,491 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,105 | 3,631 | +72% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 22,479 | 19,702 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,847 | 3,275 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 19,597 | 23,859 | +22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,896 | 3,279 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 36,951 | 29,454 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,068 | 3,302 | +60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 21,133 | 22,935 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,622 | 3,474 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 16,175 | 23,835 | +47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,471 | 3,423 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 26,996 | 30,897 | +14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,522 | 3,452 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 25,316 | 22,606 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,472 | 3,817 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 25,575 | 23,779 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,121 | 4,359 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 19,706 | 16,318 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,463 | 3,150 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | pass→pass | 23,396 | 20,335 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,387 | 4,050 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 24 cases were attempted. The headline lift of 0 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 24 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.