Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Handle the first hour of a suspected ransomware or malware infection calmly and correctly — contain it, preserve options, and avoid the moves that make it worse. Use when asked what to do about ransomware, my files are encrypted with a ransom note, I think I have malware, or my computer's been hacked. Produces an immediate containment checklist, a preserve-evidence-and-options step, a recovery path (backups, known decryptors, professional help), guidance on the ransom-payment decision, and repor
.claude/skills/mohitagw15856-ransomware-first-response/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 1% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 2% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 19% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 49% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 68% | 0% |
The first hour decides how bad a ransomware or malware incident gets. Panic leads to the wrong moves — paying immediately, wiping evidence, or reconnecting an infected machine and spreading it. This gives a calm, correct sequence: isolate, preserve your options, and recover from the safest source — while being honest that a serious business incident needs professional responders.
Ask for these if not provided:
Now (first minutes)
Recover: wipe + restore from a clean offline backup → or check for a legitimate free decryptor → or engage a professional. Payment: last resort, high risk — tradeoffs]; get advice first. Report: relevant authority/agency] · breach-notification duties if applicable].
> This is first-response guidance for a personal/small setup. A business incident, or anything with sensitive/regulated data, needs professional incident responders — engage them early.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-12 | pass→pass | 10,601 | 10,852 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,600 | 2,687 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 35,106 | 28,313 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,273 | 3,545 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 19,842 | 88,378 | +345% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,176 | 2,869 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 18,144 | 16,580 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,049 | 3,049 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 28,275 | 17,758 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,942 | 2,966 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 23,290 | 18,469 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,942 | 2,987 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 35,856 | 17,875 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,549 | 3,197 | -10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 17,471 | 25,294 | +45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,106 | 2,912 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 12,914 | 16,957 | +31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,921 | 3,246 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 14,165 | 11,493 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,091 | 2,770 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 11,843 | 10,305 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,891 | 2,548 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 12,634 | 13,722 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,448 | 2,762 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 29,819 | 27,538 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,099 | 2,489 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 33,434 | 58,253 | +74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,655 | 2,624 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 15,800 | 18,111 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,422 | 3,196 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 11,097 | 10,851 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,663 | 2,537 | +53% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 11,499 | 22,221 | +93% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,813 | 2,649 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 15,179 | 13,868 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,937 | 2,889 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | 30,971 | 19,871 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,908 | 3,297 | -16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 15,946 | 10,922 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,972 | 2,866 | +45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 10,284 | 7,924 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,587 | 2,173 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 12,292 | 11,234 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,497 | 2,796 | +87% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 11,078 | 13,565 | +22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,624 | 3,131 | +93% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | pass→pass | 17,818 | 18,543 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,744 | 4,291 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-25 | pass→pass | 11,765 | 56,640 | +381% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,120 | 3,199 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 25 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +16 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 25 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.