Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Set up a side business in the right order — the do-first sequence (separate money, basic terms, simple records) vs. the feels-official-but-waits list (logos, LLCs-by-default, office chairs), with the structure question framed honestly and routed properly. Use when asked I'm starting a side business what do I need, do I need an LLC, set up my side hustle properly, or what comes first legally and financially. Produces the ordered setup sequence, the structure-decision framing (jurisdiction-flagged
.claude/skills/mohitagw15856-side-business-setup/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 48% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 3% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 65% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 20% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 58% | 0% |
New side businesses fail setup in both directions: six weeks on a logo and an LLC for a business with zero customers, or a year of real revenue flowing through a personal checking account with no records, no terms, and a possibly-violated employment contract. The right order is boring and short: check the employer conflict first, separate the money immediately, get paid under simple written terms, keep records from dollar one — and let the structure question (sole proprietor vs. LLC vs. local equivalents) be decided when the facts justify it, with a professional, because it's jurisdiction- and situation-specific.
Ask for these if not provided:
The clauses to reread · the equipment/hours rule · the found-a-conflict route]
Money separation · the records file/sheet started · terms template readied]
Registration steps as locally required (typed, verify-locally) · the tax-setaside % habit · insurance question if liability texture warrants (typed, professional-routed)]
The honest trade table: sole-prop vs entity · this business's triggers, assessed · "ripe now" or "revisit at milestone]" · route: local accountant/attorney]
Logo, site polish, cards — after customer one]
> Registration, tax, and entity rules are jurisdiction-specific — every flagged step needs local verification, and the structure decision deserves a local professional. Not legal or tax advice.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 25,051 | 25,099 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,132 | 4,639 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 39,451 | 25,407 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,834 | 4,433 | -8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 37,195 | 25,589 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,434 | 4,561 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 21,126 | 18,642 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,579 | 4,245 | +65% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 32,150 | 31,620 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,743 | 4,709 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 26,800 | 26,051 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,309 | 3,987 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 28,133 | 25,131 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,143 | 4,511 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 23,267 | 27,012 | +16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,710 | 4,274 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 22,612 | 24,609 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,626 | 4,295 | +64% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 26,581 | 26,479 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,974 | 4,172 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 29,420 | 24,690 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,031 | 4,224 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 34,245 | 20,964 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,528 | 4,301 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 25,153 | 25,391 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,012 | 4,084 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | 30,094 | 26,576 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,088 | 3,888 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 28,472 | 29,860 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,720 | 5,253 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 28,498 | 21,818 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,299 | 4,426 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 24,292 | 26,954 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,861 | 4,324 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 21,120 | 21,361 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,889 | 3,998 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 24,151 | 22,302 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,317 | 3,836 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 24,447 | 30,146 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,350 | 4,734 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 24,305 | 21,400 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,506 | 3,351 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 15,012 | 19,281 | +28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,653 | 3,402 | +106% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +45 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.