Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Audit the user's REAL spreadsheet by opening it in the Cowork sandbox — not by reading a description of it. Use when asked to check this sheet before we present it, audit the model in my Drive, why don't these numbers add up, or is this spreadsheet safe to build on. Pulls the file via the Google Drive connector (or an uploaded .xlsx), opens it programmatically in the sandbox to trace formulas, hunts hardcodes / broken ranges / unit mixes, and produces a ranked findings artifact with a verified-v
.claude/skills/mohitagw15856-spreadsheet-audit-live/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 203% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 28% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 30% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -34% | 0% |
| case-21 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 26% | 0% |
Spreadsheets fail silently — the SUM that stops at row 40, the hardcoded 1.1 typed over a formula, the column that's monthly in one section and annual in another. In Claude Cowork this skill opens the actual file in the sandbox and traces the real formulas, so the mistake is caught before the meeting corrects it.
Ask for these if not provided:
.xlsx; the audit needs the real formulas, not a screenshot.xlsx). Never audit from values alone.xlsx skill / a Python pass with openpyxl) to read formulas, not just cached values. Enumerate sheets, named ranges, and the formula map.Guardrails: read-only on the source unless a corrected copy is explicitly requested, and then only as a new file; label unverified outputs honestly; if the connector/file is unavailable, say so — don't audit a sheet you couldn't open.
A Spreadsheet Audit artifact:
Safe to present / Fix before presenting / Do not trust — one line why
| # | Cell/range | Class | What's wrong | Currently mis-stating | |---|---|---|---|---|
| Output | Traced | Status | |---|---|---|
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-21 | pass→pass | 17,012 | 15,855 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,497 | 3,155 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | pass→fail | 18,716 | 16,625 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,183 | 1,444 | -34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 14,000 | 18,020 | +29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,496 | 3,385 | +126% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 16,252 | 15,458 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 296 | 1,351 | +356% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 11,048 | 15,438 | +40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,815 | 2,798 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 14,119 | 16,272 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,651 | 2,596 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 13,818 | 9,553 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,639 | 1,888 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 11,050 | 14,594 | +32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 895 | 2,712 | +203% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 11,362 | 12,141 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,738 | 2,137 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | 12,631 | 15,711 | +24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,656 | 2,450 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 11,589 | 4,735 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,177 | 1,827 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 15,322 | 9,565 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,578 | 2,495 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 15,710 | 14,220 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,810 | 2,311 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 18,893 | 16,242 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,896 | 2,703 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 11,645 | 6,472 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,319 | 1,899 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 8,951 | 6,526 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 579 | 2,060 | +256% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 14,424 | 7,660 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,525 | 1,985 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 23,969 | 21,815 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,338 | 3,159 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 16,346 | 14,644 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,702 | 2,232 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 15,959 | 14,310 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,727 | 2,404 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 37,065 | 31,765 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,222 | 4,002 | -51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 13,986 | 19,771 | +41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,712 | 3,786 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 9,783 | 11,864 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,608 | 2,712 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 2 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.