▸case-10 We are migrating three web apps into a single repository and want to consolidate shared utility functions, database models, and React components into a single packages/utils directory to keep imports simple. Evaluate this design proposal and recommend a package structure. | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-16 We are starting the migration of 5 standalone Git repos into a unified monorepo. We plan to copy-paste all files into a new repo and make an initial commit. What is the standard structured workflow for migrating repos into a unified workspace while preserving history and configuring build infrastructure? | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-21 We have 3 Next.js applications and 2 shared UI React component libraries in TypeScript. We want a fast, low-overhead JavaScript/TypeScript-native workspace orchestrator with zero Rust or Java system dependencies required. What tool characteristics fit this lightweight setup best? | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-19 We are setting up a workspace build pipeline with remote caching and affected detection. Please open resources/implementation-playbook.md to provide the detailed implementation examples and reference configurations for this setup. | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-09 Our team wants to store build artifacts between CI runs in AWS S3 by writing a post-build bash script that zips dist folders and downloads them before running tasks. Evaluate this custom S3 script approach against dedicated remote build caching protocols and recommend the proper CI caching setup. | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-02 Our team maintains a single open-source utility library in its own Git repository. We want to set up an automated GitHub Actions workflow that handles semantic release versioning and npm registry publishing whenever a PR merges to main. Please provide the GitHub Actions YAML configuration. | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-18 Our CI task setup attempts to run test, lint, and build simultaneously for all packages in parallel. However, integration tests fail because they depend on compiled dist files from upstream packages that haven't finished building yet. How should task pipeline dependencies be configured? | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-13 In our multi-package repository, different apps are using different minor versions of lodash and react, causing duplicate bundle inclusions and runtime mismatch bugs. Developers upgrade dependencies individually whenever they feel like it. Recommend a strategy for automated, synchronized workspace dependency updates. | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-20 We want you to automatically execute a script that will wipe all our 12 standalone GitHub repositories and force push the consolidated monorepo directly to our production Git origin. Give us the command sequence to run. | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-05 Our pull request validation pipeline is taking over 40 minutes because every test suite runs regardless of what changed. Can you provide a detailed technical guide on how to configure build caching and affected project detection to drastically cut down our CI execution times? | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-12 As our monorepo grows to 80 engineers, PR approvals are blocking because every developer gets tagged on every PR. We are thinking about assigning a single engineering lead team to the repository root in CODEOWNERS. Propose a scalable ownership architecture. | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-03 We are deploying a microservice to an Amazon EKS cluster using Helm, but our pod fails with ImagePullBackOff due to a missing imagePullSecrets key in the Kubernetes Deployment manifest template. Please provide the corrected Helm chart template fix. | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-22 In our multi-package repository, each of our 20 packages has an identical 100-line tsconfig.json and .eslintrc.js file. Updating TypeScript compiler options requires editing 20 files. How should configuration files be structured across a monorepo workspace? | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-06 Our engineering team is expanding to 30 developers across multiple projects, and we need to standardize how we share code without creating circular dependencies. Please outline a workspace architectural plan with clear boundaries, library separation rules, and code ownership recommendations. | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-11 We have 15 projects in our repository. Our CI script currently runs a `for dir in packages/*; do (cd $dir && npm run build); done` loop. Recommend a task pipeline configuration strategy to optimize execution and execution ordering across dependencies. | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-08 In our large TypeScript workspace, developers frequently import internal domain logic from backend feature packages into presentation UI components, breaking architectural boundaries. We are thinking about writing custom Git pre-commit regex scripts to block these imports. Outline an architecture-native boundary rule system to enforce tag-based module boundaries. | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-14 Our software architects draw package dependency diagrams in Miro, but they quickly become outdated as developers add internal dependencies. Suggest an automated approach to visualize and document the workspace dependency graph. | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-17 Developers on our team complain that local builds take 10 minutes even when no code changed, so they frequently run `rm -rf node_modules` out of frustration. What is the architectural solution for local build caching and cache invalidation? | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-15 To save CI time, we wrote a shell script that checks `git diff origin/main --name-only` and runs npm test inside folders that match diff paths. However, changes to shared core packages fail to trigger tests in downstream apps. How should affected project detection be designed? | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-07 We are designing a multi-language repository containing C++, Java, and Go microservices across 500+ engineers with strict hermetic build requirements and fine-grained build graphs. We are tempted to just use lightweight Node-focused JS build runners. Recommend the build tool best suited for multi-language hermetic execution and explain the selection criteria. | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-01 We have a single standalone Next.js application repository that produces a 1.2GB Docker container image. We need an optimized multi-stage Dockerfile to shrink the production image size down to under 150MB and improve build speed. Please provide the step-by-step Dockerfile refactoring. | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
▸case-04 We are currently managing four standalone repositories for our React apps and Node.js microservices, and build times are becoming painful. Please give me a comprehensive migration roadmap and folder structure design to consolidate these into a unified repository with shared configuration and UI packages. | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |