Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -56% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -38% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -62% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -24% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -26% | 0% |
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes, derived from Andrej Karpathy's observations on LLM coding pitfalls.
Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
When your changes create orphans:
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.