Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Reproduce a bug from a Linear ticket with a failing test. Expects the full ticket context (title, description, comments) to be provided as input.
.claude/skills/n8n-io-n8n-reproduce-bug/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 63% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -5% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 7% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 13% | 0% |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 19% | 0% |
Given a Linear ticket context ($ARGUMENTS), systematically reproduce the bug with a failing regression test.
Extract the following from the provided ticket context:
Based on the affected area, pick the test layer and pattern:
| Area | Test Layer | Pattern | Key Location | |------|-----------|---------|--------------| | Node operation | Vitest unit | NodeTestHarness + nock | packages/nodes-base/nodes/*/test/ | | Node credential | Vitest unit | vitest-mock-extended | packages/nodes-base/nodes/*/test/ | | Trigger webhook | Vitest unit | mock IHookFunctions + vi.mock GenericFunctions | packages/nodes-base/nodes/*/test/ | | Binary data | Vitest unit | NodeTestHarness assertBinaryData | packages/core/nodes-testing/ | | Execution engine | Vitest integration | WorkflowRunner + DI container | packages/cli/src/__tests__/ | | CLI / API | Vitest integration | setupTestServer + supertest | packages/cli/test/integration/ | | Config | Vitest unit | GlobalConfig + Container | packages/@n8n/config/src/configs/__tests__/ | | Editor UI | Vitest | Vue Test Utils + Pinia | packages/frontend/editor-ui/src/**/__tests__/ | | E2E / Canvas | Playwright | Test containers + composables | packages/testing/playwright/ |
Find the source code for the affected area:
git log --oneline -10 -- <path>)Read the source code and trace the execution path that triggers the bug:
State a clear, testable hypothesis:
Look for existing tests in the same area:
test/ directories near the affected codeWrite a regression test that:
Complete the test safety gate in /AGENTS.md before you run the test:
N8N_USER_FOLDER before importing modules that resolve itRun the test from the package directory (e.g., cd packages/nodes-base && pnpm test <file>).
Classify the result:
| Confidence | Criteria | Output | |------------|----------|--------| | CONFIRMED | Test fails consistently, failure matches hypothesis | Reproduction Report | | LIKELY | Test fails but failure mode differs slightly | Report + caveat | | UNCONFIRMED | Cannot trigger the failure | Report: what was tried | | SKIPPED | Hit a hard bailout trigger | Report: why skipped | | ALREADY_FIXED | Bug no longer reproduces on current code | Report: when fixed |
If UNCONFIRMED after first attempt:
Hard bailout triggers (stop immediately):
Present findings in this format:
Ticket: ID] — title] Confidence: CONFIRMED | LIKELY | UNCONFIRMED | SKIPPED | ALREADY_FIXED]
1-2 sentences explaining the bug mechanism]
| File | Lines | Issue | |------|-------|-------| | path/to/file.ts | XX-YY | Description of the problem |
path/to/test/file.test.ts — X/Y tests fail:
test name — failure description]Pseudocode or description of the fix approach]
pushd packages/nodes-base && pnpm test <file> && popd)pnpm build > build.log 2>&1| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 5,455 | 8,631 | +58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 276 | 1,771 | +542% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 6,297 | 6,276 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 211 | 1,683 | +698% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 7,129 | 7,235 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 327 | 1,696 | +419% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 8,763 | 4,327 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,301 | 2,126 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 15,138 | 6,630 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,704 | 1,685 | -38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 16,008 | 13,518 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,823 | 1,691 | -40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 12,208 | 4,182 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,992 | 1,896 | -5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 13,431 | 3,061 | -77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,106 | 1,798 | -15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 13,361 | 3,960 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,788 | 1,905 | +7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 14,380 | 3,228 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,313 | 1,873 | -19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 6,458 | 3,351 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 946 | 1,790 | +89% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 11,589 | 3,468 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,733 | 1,806 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 6,322 | 2,555 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 981 | 1,729 | +76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | 6,695 | 2,949 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 862 | 1,673 | +94% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 7,469 | 3,618 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,204 | 1,834 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 4,647 | 2,937 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 704 | 1,688 | +140% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | 12,466 | 3,607 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,677 | 1,938 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 11,512 | 2,806 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,629 | 1,835 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 7,418 | 2,453 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 994 | 1,656 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 14,850 | 6,457 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,922 | 2,286 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 8,456 | 3,588 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,223 | 1,842 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 8,998 | 3,021 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,258 | 1,762 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→pass | 12,100 | 4,234 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,283 | 1,915 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | pass→fail | 13,146 | 8,231 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,426 | 1,877 | -23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-25 | pass→fail | 20,798 | 7,312 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,604 | 1,684 | -53% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-26 | pass→fail | 39,959 | 7,714 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 7,416 | 1,685 | -77% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 26 cases were attempted, and 18 counted toward the lift figure. The other 8 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +15 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 18 comparable cases. 3 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.