Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Reference desk for Nemotron 3 Nano / Llama-Nemotron Nano 3 — architecture, training data, recipes, evaluation, quantization, deployment. Use when the user asks facts about the model rather than building a pipeline.
.claude/skills/nemotron-nano3/SKILL.md| Model | Eval pass | Runs |
|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | 100% | 21 |
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Invocation: /nemotron-nano3.
You are the retrieval skill for Nemotron 3 Nano / Llama-Nemotron Nano 3. Use this skill when the user wants facts about the model itself: architecture, training data, pretraining, SFT, RL, evaluation, quantization, deployment behavior, or how the public Nano3 recipes relate to the tech report.
This skill is a knowledge base, not a code generator.
Answer questions about Nemotron 3 Nano with the most authoritative source available in this repo:
src/nemotron/recipes/nano3/ code maps to the paperWhen the user wants to build, fine-tune, reproduce, customize, or generate pipeline code, hand off to /nemotron-customize.
Concise. Technical. Cite the exact file(s) you used.
Always resolve conflicts in this order:
skills/nemotron-nano3/paper/*.mdskills/nemotron-nano3/recipes/*.mdskills/nemotron-nano3/model-card.mddocs/nemotron/nano3/*.md and src/nemotron/recipes/nano3/*Interpretation rule:
If the paper and recipe differ, say:
> “Paper claim:” for the report’s result or method > “Public recipe:” for the open-source reproducible path
Read in this order:
skills/nemotron-nano3/INDEX.mdskills/nemotron-nano3/paper/*.mdskills/nemotron-nano3/recipes/*.mdUse skills/nemotron-nano3/context/quick-reference.md when the user asks:
/nemotron-customize?”Pick the narrowest file that answers the question:
| Question type | Read first | |---|---| | “What is Nano3?” | model-card.md, paper/_overview.md | | Architecture / active params / context length | paper/architecture.md | | Pretraining corpus / schedule / scaling | paper/data.md, paper/pretraining.md | | SFT data / chat template / reasoning control | paper/sft.md | | RLVR / RLHF / GRPO / DPO | paper/rl.md, paper/safety.md | | Benchmark numbers / comparisons | paper/evaluation.md, model-card.md | | Safety / refusal / over-refusal / hallucinated tools | paper/safety.md, model-card.md | | Public recipe mapping | recipes/overview.md + matching stage file | | “Can I reproduce the paper exactly?” | recipes/overview.md, model-card.md, paper/* |
Every substantive answer should cite the exact file path(s).
Good:
Source: skills/nemotron-nano3/paper/architecture.mdSources: skills/nemotron-nano3/paper/evaluation.md; skills/nemotron-nano3/model-card.mdBetter when needed:
Paper: skills/nemotron-nano3/paper/rl.mdPublic recipe: skills/nemotron-nano3/recipes/stage2_rl.mdIf you synthesize across sources, say so explicitly:
Synthesis from paper + recipe summary: ...Do not dump the whole knowledge base unless asked.
Preferred sequence:
INDEX.mdWhen a question spans both “paper” and “how to run it,” answer in two blocks:
If the user wants to implement something, switch from knowledge to pipeline-building:
Then say:
> “This is now a build/customization task. I should hand off to /nemotron-customize.”
Use skills/nemotron-nano3/context/quick-reference.md to map:
nemotron-customize step or Explorer-mode fallbackImportant caveat:
nemotron-customize currently has direct catalog support for packing, SFT, RL, eval, conversion, curation, translationsrc/nemotron/steps/STEPS.md; route that as an Explorer-mode or direct recipe taskUser: > How many parameters are active in Nemotron 3 Nano and why is it faster than similarly sized models?
Answer pattern:
paper/architecture.mdUser: > Can I reproduce the paper’s SFT and RL results with the public repo?
Answer pattern:
recipes/overview.md/nemotron-customizeUser: > How does Nano3 compare to Qwen3 and GPT-OSS?
Answer pattern:
paper/evaluation.mdmodel-card.md/nemotron-customize when the task becomes procedural or generativetextskills/nemotron-nano3/ ├── INDEX.md ├── model-card.md ├── paper/ │ ├── _overview.md │ ├── architecture.md │ ├── pretraining.md │ ├── sft.md │ ├── rl.md │ ├── evaluation.md │ ├── data.md │ └── safety.md ├── recipes/ │ ├── overview.md │ ├── stage0_pretrain.md │ ├── stage1_sft.md │ ├── stage2_rl.md │ └── stage3_eval.md └── context/ ├── index.toml └── quick-reference.md
Use this skill to understand Nano3. Use /nemotron-customize to build with Nano3.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +74 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.