Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →AI-powered visual regression testing skill for e-commerce websites. Designs screenshot comparison workflows, mobile/desktop visual checks, and change detection alerts to prevent conversion-killing UI bugs.
.claude/skills/nexscope-ai-visual-regression-testing/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 91% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 38% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 13% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 69% | 0% |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 21% | 0% |
AI-powered visual regression testing skill for e-commerce websites. Designs screenshot comparison workflows, mobile/desktop visual checks, and change detection alerts to prevent conversion-killing UI bugs.
clawhub install visual-regression-testingInput: Website URL, critical pages, device/viewport targets
Output: Visual test suite design, screenshot comparison rules, mobile check checklist, anomaly alerting config
> "I run a your business type] on platform]. Help me set up visual regression testing for my business. Here's my current situation: describe context]."
Built by Nexscope AI — AI-powered e-commerce intelligence.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-03 | pass→pass | 15,252 | 14,564 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,223 | 2,498 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | pass→pass | 18,396 | 22,322 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,751 | 4,042 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 14,753 | 15,395 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,171 | 2,623 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 9,796 | 16,144 | +65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,483 | 2,829 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 15,211 | 19,098 | +26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,389 | 3,373 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 17,015 | 19,428 | +14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,507 | 3,477 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 12,552 | 16,112 | +28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,768 | 2,695 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 18,759 | 21,625 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,864 | 3,596 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | 14,202 | 14,080 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,034 | 2,574 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 10,456 | 12,356 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,722 | 2,350 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 13,856 | 14,313 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,263 | 2,665 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 10,593 | 11,712 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,643 | 2,269 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 16,956 | 16,754 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,499 | 2,815 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 12,141 | 15,309 | +26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,126 | 2,902 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→fail | 13,233 | 14,683 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,166 | 2,776 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 9,039 | 13,764 | +52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,522 | 2,572 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 12,685 | 15,750 | +24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,050 | 2,838 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→fail | 13,238 | 16,862 | +27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,112 | 3,106 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 15,092 | 16,272 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,487 | 3,016 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 14,384 | 17,367 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,821 | 3,597 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 17,057 | 13,620 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,730 | 3,113 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 11,867 | 11,379 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,170 | 2,472 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +14 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 3 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.