Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Node.js development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, security, and architecture. Teaches thinking, not copying.
.claude/skills/nodejs-best-practices/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-17 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
> Principles and decision-making for Node.js development in 2025. > Learn to THINK, not memorize code patterns.
Use this skill when making Node.js architecture decisions, choosing frameworks, designing async patterns, or applying security and deployment best practices.
This skill teaches decision-making principles, not fixed code to copy.
What are you building?
│
├── Edge/Serverless (Cloudflare, Vercel)
│ └── Hono (zero-dependency, ultra-fast cold starts)
│
├── High Performance API
│ └── Fastify (2-3x faster than Express)
│
├── Enterprise/Team familiarity
│ └── NestJS (structured, DI, decorators)
│
├── Legacy/Stable/Maximum ecosystem
│ └── Express (mature, most middleware)
│
└── Full-stack with frontend
└── Next.js API Routes or tRPC| Factor | Hono | Fastify | Express | |--------|------|---------|---------| | Best for | Edge, serverless | Performance | Legacy, learning | | Cold start | Fastest | Fast | Moderate | | Ecosystem | Growing | Good | Largest | | TypeScript | Native | Excellent | Good | | Learning curve | Low | Medium | Low |
Node.js 22+: --experimental-strip-types
├── Run .ts files directly
├── No build step needed for simple projects
└── Consider for: scripts, simple APIsESM (import/export)
├── Modern standard
├── Better tree-shaking
├── Async module loading
└── Use for: new projects
CommonJS (require)
├── Legacy compatibility
├── More npm packages support
└── Use for: existing codebases, some edge cases| Runtime | Best For | |---------|----------| | Node.js | General purpose, largest ecosystem | | Bun | Performance, built-in bundler | | Deno | Security-first, built-in TypeScript |
Request Flow:
│
├── Controller/Route Layer
│ ├── Handles HTTP specifics
│ ├── Input validation at boundary
│ └── Calls service layer
│
├── Service Layer
│ ├── Business logic
│ ├── Framework-agnostic
│ └── Calls repository layer
│
└── Repository Layer
├── Data access only
├── Database queries
└── ORM interactionsPattern:
├── Create custom error classes
├── Throw from any layer
├── Catch at top level (middleware)
└── Format consistent responseClient gets:
├── Appropriate HTTP status
├── Error code for programmatic handling
├── User-friendly message
└── NO internal details (security!)
Logs get:
├── Full stack trace
├── Request context
├── User ID (if applicable)
└── Timestamp| Situation | Status | When | |-----------|--------|------| | Bad input | 400 | Client sent invalid data | | No auth | 401 | Missing or invalid credentials | | No permission | 403 | Valid auth, but not allowed | | Not found | 404 | Resource doesn't exist | | Conflict | 409 | Duplicate or state conflict | | Validation | 422 | Schema valid but business rules fail | | Server error | 500 | Our fault, log everything |
| Pattern | Use When | |---------|----------| | async/await | Sequential async operations | | Promise.all | Parallel independent operations | | Promise.allSettled | Parallel where some can fail | | Promise.race | Timeout or first response wins |
I/O-bound (async helps):
├── Database queries
├── HTTP requests
├── File system
└── Network operations
CPU-bound (async doesn't help):
├── Crypto operations
├── Image processing
├── Complex calculations
└── → Use worker threads or offloadWhere to validate:
├── API entry point (request body/params)
├── Before database operations
├── External data (API responses, file uploads)
└── Environment variables (startup)| Library | Best For | |---------|----------| | Zod | TypeScript first, inference | | Valibot | Smaller bundle (tree-shakeable) | | ArkType | Performance critical | | Yup | Existing React Form usage |
Trust nothing:
├── Query params → validate
├── Request body → validate
├── Headers → verify
├── Cookies → validate
├── File uploads → scan
└── External APIs → validate response| Type | Purpose | Tools | |------|---------|-------| | Unit | Business logic | node:test, Vitest | | Integration | API endpoints | Supertest | | E2E | Full flows | Playwright |
node --test src/**/*.test.ts
├── No external dependency
├── Good coverage reporting
└── Watch mode availableBefore implementing:
> Remember: Node.js best practices are about decision-making, not memorizing patterns. Every project deserves fresh consideration based on its requirements.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-24 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 24 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +8 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 24 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.