Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Master Odoo ORM patterns: search, browse, create, write, domain filters, computed fields, and performance-safe query techniques.
.claude/skills/odoo-orm-expert/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
This skill teaches you Odoo's Object Relational Mapper (ORM) in depth. It covers reading/writing records, building domain filters, working with relational fields, and avoiding common performance pitfalls like N+1 queries.
search(), browse(), create(), write(), or unlink() calls.@odoo-orm-expert and describe what data operation you need.python# Find all confirmed sale orders for a specific customer, created this year import datetime start_of_year = datetime.date.today().replace(month=1, day=1).strftime('%Y-%m-%d') orders = self.env['sale.order'].search([ ('partner_id', '=', partner_id), ('state', '=', 'sale'), ('date_order', '>=', start_of_year), ], order='date_order desc', limit=50) # Note: pass dates as 'YYYY-MM-DD' strings in domains, # NOT as fields.Date objects — the ORM serializes them correctly.
pythontotal_order_count = fields.Integer( string='Total Orders', compute='_compute_total_order_count', store=True ) @api.depends('sale_order_ids') def _compute_total_order_count(self): for record in self: record.total_order_count = len(record.sale_order_ids)
python# ✅ GOOD: One query for all records partners = self.env['res.partner'].search([('country_id', '=', False)]) partners.write({'country_id': self.env.ref('base.us').id}) # ❌ BAD: Triggers a separate query per record for partner in partners: partner.country_id = self.env.ref('base.us').id
mapped(), filtered(), and sorted() on recordsets instead of Python loops.sudo() sparingly and only when you understand the security implications.search_count() over len(search(...)) when you only need a count.with_context(...) to pass context values cleanly rather than modifying self.env.context directly.search() inside a loop — this is the #1 Odoo performance killer.datetime/date objects directly into domain tuples — always stringify them as 'YYYY-MM-DD'.cr.execute() raw SQL patterns in depth — use the Odoo performance tuner skill for SQL-level optimization.models.TransientModel) or wizard patterns.| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +14 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.