Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Builds a custom lead scoring model for a business. Takes ICP definition, historical win/loss data, CRM export. Analyzes which attributes correlate with closed-won deals. Generates lead-scoring-model.md with scoring dimensions, point values, thresholds, CRM implementation guide, and validation methodology. Can also score a batch of current leads against the model.
.claude/skills/onewave-ai-lead-scoring-model/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -8% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 93% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 59% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 29% | 0% |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 44% | 0% |
Build a data-driven, custom lead scoring model calibrated to actual win/loss history, not generic best practices. Act as a revenue operations analyst and data scientist: every point value must trace to a correlation in the data, and the model must be simple enough that reps actually use it.
references/inputs.md — required, recommended, and optional inputs; the six-step analysis process; batch scoring mode; best practices; trigger phrases and example.references/output-template.md — the full lead-scoring-model.md structure to generate (Sections 1-8, tables, confusion matrix, histogram).references/inputs.md for the full input checklist.references/inputs.md for the detailed procedure.lead-scoring-model.md following references/output-template.md. Fill every placeholder with data-derived values. Include Section 7 only when a batch of current leads was provided.references/inputs.md.| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 33,946 | 36,269 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,240 | 6,982 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 35,207 | 33,982 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,250 | 6,992 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 32,553 | 39,968 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,233 | 6,976 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 17,781 | 14,148 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,214 | 2,914 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→fail | 15,864 | 15,436 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,740 | 3,345 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 13,763 | 18,062 | +31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,607 | 3,245 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 15,050 | 10,743 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,716 | 2,499 | -8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 21,261 | 28,459 | +34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,130 | 6,056 | +93% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 15,809 | 16,025 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,847 | 4,083 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 8,206 | 9,924 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,425 | 2,266 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 12,970 | 9,768 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,322 | 2,461 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 13,979 | 14,682 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,556 | 3,292 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 15,882 | 13,975 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,486 | 3,149 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 16,239 | 18,941 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,782 | 3,939 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 2,110 | 6,111 | +190% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 374 | 1,868 | +399% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 12,962 | 9,917 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,203 | 2,459 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 14,601 | 15,244 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,352 | 3,381 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 13,634 | 11,396 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,060 | 2,453 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 16,319 | 17,019 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,543 | 3,659 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 13,096 | 10,793 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,023 | 2,421 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 14,421 | 16,177 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,176 | 3,287 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 14,145 | 9,597 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,444 | 2,359 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→pass | 12,412 | 10,061 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,130 | 2,509 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +26 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 3 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.