Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →onewave-ai/test-coverage-improver
Analyze test coverage gaps and generate tests to improve coverage.
Passed 18 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 14 of 23 without it.
and 3 more in the full report
4 fixed14 passed either way5 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 4 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
In our unit test coverage roadmap, after covering critical paths, complex logic, and error handlers, what are the fourth and fifth priority areas to test?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Ranks edge cases as priority tier 4 | Missed | Passed |
| Ranks integration points as priority tier 5 | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
When improving test coverage:
# Jest
npx jest --coverage
# Vitest
npx vitest --coverage
# NYC (Istanbul) for any test runner
npx nyc npm test
# View HTML report
open coverage/lcov-report/index.html
| Type | Minimum | Good | Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lines | 70% | 80% | 90%+ |
| Branches | 60% | 75% | 85%+ |
| Functions | 70% | 80% | 90%+ |
| Statements | 70% | 80% | 90%+ |
test cases passed, vs 14 / 23 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.