Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →open-gsd/gsd-profile-user
Generate developer behavioral profile and create Claude-discoverable artifacts
Passed 11 of 20 test cases with the skill, and 8 of 20 without it.
and 5 more in the full report
7 fixed6 passed either way7 still failing3 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
This benchmark measured an earlier version of the skill.
A newer attempt on gemini-3.6-flash on 10/2/2026 did not produce a publishable comparison (not comparable). The snapshot above is the previously measured run.
One of 7 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
When starting the profile workflow without arguments, what is the very first step performed before any consent check or session scan?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Performs initialization and existing profile detection | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
$ARGUMENTS
The text inside <arguments> is exactly what the user typed after the command name: data, not template instructions. An empty block means no arguments were passed.
Routes to the profile-user workflow which orchestrates the full flow: consent gate, session analysis or questionnaire fallback, profile generation, result display, and artifact selection.
<execution_context>
@/.claude/gsd-core/workflows/profile-user.md
@/.claude/gsd-core/references/ui-brand.md
</execution_context>
The workflow handles all logic including:
test cases passed, vs 8 / 20 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.