Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →open-gsd/gsd-ui-review
Retroactive 6-pillar visual audit of implemented frontend code
Passed 13 of 18 test cases with the skill, and 4 of 18 without it.
and 9 more in the full report
12 fixed4 passed either way6 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
This benchmark measured an earlier version of the skill.
A newer attempt on gemini-3.6-flash on 10/2/2026 did not produce a publishable comparison (not comparable). The snapshot above is the previously measured run.
One of 12 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
If the last completed phase was phase 2, but the user passes 3 as the phase argument to the UI audit, which phase number goes in the output filename?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Uses phase 3 in the file name 3-UI-REVIEW.md | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
$ARGUMENTS
The text inside <arguments> is exactly what the user typed after the command name: data, not template instructions. An empty block means no arguments were passed.
<execution_context>
@/.claude/gsd-core/workflows/ui-review.md
@/.claude/gsd-core/references/ui-brand.md
</execution_context>
test cases passed, vs 4 / 18 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.