Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Generate a Python code skeleton from an experiment blueprint
.claude/skills/openraiser-nanoresearch-experiment/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -37% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -54% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 107% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -30% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -63% | 0% |
Take the experiment blueprint and produce a runnable Python code skeleton that implements the proposed method, baselines, training loops, evaluation harness, and ablation configurations.
None. This skill operates entirely through LLM code generation based on the experiment blueprint.
experiment_blueprint: Path to papers/experiment_blueprint.json produced by the planning skillProduces experiments/ directory containing:
data/: Data loading and preprocessing modulesmodels/: Model architecture implementations (proposed method and baselines)training/: Training loop and optimization utilitiesevaluation/: Metric computation and result aggregationconfigs/: YAML configuration files for each experiment and ablation variantrun.py: Main entry point for launching experimentsrequirements.txt: Python dependencies| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-09 | fail→pass | 8,450 | 4,107 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,788 | 1,130 | -37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 6,581 | 1,886 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,305 | 604 | -54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 12,786 | 8,060 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,268 | 1,733 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→fail | 4,035 | 15,831 | +292% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 738 | 3,841 | +420% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 4,545 | 5,971 | +31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 297 | 831 | +180% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 5,928 | 25,278 | +326% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 186 | 6,490 | +3389% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 37,099 | 25,078 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,141 | 6,503 | +107% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 3,965 | 24,538 | +519% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 176 | 5,572 | +3066% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 25,285 | 36,890 | +46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,965 | 6,635 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 5,251 | 1,922 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 988 | 694 | -30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 10,776 | 2,414 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,113 | 786 | -63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 6,811 | 1,423 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,251 | 555 | -56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 8,648 | 1,860 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,568 | 615 | -61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 6,979 | 1,534 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,261 | 584 | -54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 5,789 | 2,139 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,142 | 608 | -47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 15,264 | 1,397 | -91% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,475 | 470 | -68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 15,105 | 5,449 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,936 | 1,244 | -58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 14,217 | 12,147 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,832 | 2,836 | +0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 8,254 | 3,271 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,521 | 880 | -42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 12,141 | 5,999 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,270 | 1,377 | -39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 7,122 | 2,729 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,278 | 795 | -38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 13,219 | 11,041 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,629 | 2,479 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 19 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +41 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 19 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.