Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Open-source pipeline: fork, sanitize, and package private projects for safe public release. Chains 3 agents (forker, sanitizer, packager). Triggers: '/opensource', 'open source this', 'make this public', 'prepare for open source'.
.claude/skills/opensource-pipeline/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Safely open-source any project through a 3-stage pipeline: Fork (strip secrets) → Sanitize (verify clean) → Package (CLAUDE.md + setup.sh + README).
/opensource fork, /opensource verify, or /opensource package| Command | Action | |---------|--------| | /opensource fork PROJECT | Full pipeline: fork + sanitize + package | | /opensource verify PROJECT | Run sanitizer on existing repo | | /opensource package PROJECT | Generate CLAUDE.md + setup.sh + README | | /opensource list | Show all staged projects | | /opensource status PROJECT | Show reports for a staged project |
Full pipeline — the main workflow.
Resolve the project path. If PROJECT contains /, treat as a path (absolute or relative). Otherwise check: current working directory, $HOME/PROJECT, then ask the user.
SOURCE_PATH="<resolved absolute path>"
STAGING_PATH="$HOME/opensource-staging/${PROJECT_NAME}"Ask the user:
gh api user -q .login)bashmkdir -p $HOME/opensource-staging/
Spawn the opensource-forker agent:
Agent(
description="Fork {PROJECT} for open-source",
subagent_type="opensource-forker",
prompt="""
Fork project for open-source release.
Source: {SOURCE_PATH}
Target: {STAGING_PATH}
License: {chosen_license}
Follow the full forking protocol:
1. Copy files (exclude .git, node_modules, __pycache__, .venv)
2. Strip all secrets and credentials
3. Replace internal references with placeholders
4. Generate .env.example
5. Clean git history
6. Generate FORK_REPORT.md in {STAGING_PATH}/FORK_REPORT.md
"""
)Wait for completion. Read {STAGING_PATH}/FORK_REPORT.md.
Spawn the opensource-sanitizer agent:
Agent(
description="Verify {PROJECT} sanitization",
subagent_type="opensource-sanitizer",
prompt="""
Verify sanitization of open-source fork.
Project: {STAGING_PATH}
Source (for reference): {SOURCE_PATH}
Run ALL scan categories:
1. Secrets scan (CRITICAL)
2. PII scan (CRITICAL)
3. Internal references scan (CRITICAL)
4. Dangerous files check (CRITICAL)
5. Configuration completeness (WARNING)
6. Git history audit
Generate SANITIZATION_REPORT.md inside {STAGING_PATH}/ with PASS/FAIL verdict.
"""
)Wait for completion. Read {STAGING_PATH}/SANITIZATION_REPORT.md.
If FAIL: Show findings to user. Ask: "Fix these and re-scan, or abort?"
If PASS or PASS WITH WARNINGS: Continue to Step 5.
Spawn the opensource-packager agent:
Agent(
description="Package {PROJECT} for open-source",
subagent_type="opensource-packager",
prompt="""
Generate open-source packaging for project.
Project: {STAGING_PATH}
License: {chosen_license}
Project name: {PROJECT_NAME}
Description: {description}
GitHub repo: {github_repo}
Generate:
1. CLAUDE.md (commands, architecture, key files)
2. setup.sh (one-command bootstrap, make executable)
3. README.md (or enhance existing)
4. LICENSE
5. CONTRIBUTING.md
6. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ (bug_report.md, feature_request.md)
"""
)Present to user:
Open-Source Fork Ready: {PROJECT_NAME}
Location: {STAGING_PATH}
License: {license}
Files generated:
- CLAUDE.md
- setup.sh (executable)
- README.md
- LICENSE
- CONTRIBUTING.md
- .env.example ({N} variables)
Sanitization: {sanitization_verdict}
Next steps:
1. Review: cd {STAGING_PATH}
2. Create repo: gh repo create {github_org}/{github_repo} --public
3. Push: git remote add origin ... && git push -u origin main
Proceed with GitHub creation? (yes/no/review first)bashcd "{STAGING_PATH}" gh repo create "{github_org}/{github_repo}" --public --source=. --push --description "{description}"
Run sanitizer independently. Resolve path: if PROJECT contains /, treat as a path. Otherwise check $HOME/opensource-staging/PROJECT, then $HOME/PROJECT, then current directory.
Agent(
subagent_type="opensource-sanitizer",
prompt="Verify sanitization of: {resolved_path}. Run all 6 scan categories and generate SANITIZATION_REPORT.md."
)Run packager independently. Ask for "License?" and "Description?", then:
Agent(
subagent_type="opensource-packager",
prompt="Package: {resolved_path} ..."
)bashls -d $HOME/opensource-staging/*/
Show each project with pipeline progress (FORK_REPORT.md, SANITIZATION_REPORT.md, CLAUDE.md presence).
bashcat $HOME/opensource-staging/${PROJECT}/SANITIZATION_REPORT.md cat $HOME/opensource-staging/${PROJECT}/FORK_REPORT.md
$HOME/opensource-staging/
my-project/
FORK_REPORT.md # From forker agent
SANITIZATION_REPORT.md # From sanitizer agent
CLAUDE.md # From packager agent
setup.sh # From packager agent
README.md # From packager agent
.env.example # From forker agent
... # Sanitized project files.env, *.pem, or credentials.json in the staging directorySee security-review for secret detection patterns used by the sanitizer.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +27 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.