Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →openteams-lab/pdf4me-automation
Automate Pdf4me tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
Passed 14 of 20 test cases with the skill, and 7 of 20 without it.
and 4 more in the full report
7 fixed8 passed either way7 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 7 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I am preparing the payload for RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL to call a discovered Pdf4me tool. Since I don't have any past conversation context or key-value pairs to pass in memory, should I omit the memory argument entirely?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Includes the memory parameter as an empty object in RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL call | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Automate Pdf4me operations through Composio's Pdf4me toolkit via Rube MCP.
Toolkit docs: composio.dev/toolkits/pdf4me
RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONS with toolkit pdf4meRUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS first to get current tool schemasGet Rube MCP: Add https://rube.app/mcp as an MCP server in your client configuration. No API keys needed — just add the endpoint and it works.
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS respondsRUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONS with toolkit pdf4meAlways discover available tools before executing workflows:
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS
queries: [{use_case: "Pdf4me operations", known_fields: ""}]
session: {generate_id: true}
This returns available tool slugs, input schemas, recommended execution plans, and known pitfalls.
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS
queries: [{use_case: "your specific Pdf4me task"}]
test cases passed, vs 7 / 20 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.