Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Uses Microsoft RESTler to perform stateful REST API fuzzing by automatically generating and executing test sequences that exercise API endpoints, discover producer-consumer dependencies between requests, and find security and reliability bugs. The tester compiles an OpenAPI specification into a RESTler fuzzing grammar, configures authentication, runs test/fuzz-lean/fuzz modes, and analyzes results for 500 errors, authentication bypasses, resource leaks, and payload injection vulnerabilities. Activates for requests involving API fuzzing, RESTler testing, stateful API testing, or automated API security scanning.
.claude/skills/performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
Do not use against production environments without explicit authorization and monitoring. RESTler creates and deletes resources aggressively during fuzzing.
bash# Clone and build RESTler git clone https://github.com/microsoft/restler-fuzzer.git cd restler-fuzzer # Build RESTler python3 ./build-restler.py --dest_dir /opt/restler # Verify installation /opt/restler/restler/Restler --help # Alternative: Use pre-built release # Download from https://github.com/microsoft/restler-fuzzer/releases
bash# Compile the OpenAPI spec into a RESTler fuzzing grammar /opt/restler/restler/Restler compile \ --api_spec /path/to/openapi.yaml # Output directory structure: # Compile/ # grammar.py - Generated fuzzing grammar # grammar.json - Grammar in JSON format # dict.json - Custom dictionary for fuzzing values # engine_settings.json - Engine configuration # config.json - Compilation config
Custom dictionary for targeted fuzzing (dict.json):
json{ "restler_fuzzable_string": [ "fuzzstring", "' OR '1'='1", "\" OR \"1\"=\"1", "<script>alert(1)</script>", "../../../etc/passwd", "${7*7}", "{{7*7}}", "a]UNION SELECT 1,2,3--", "\"; cat /etc/passwd; echo \"", "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA" ], "restler_fuzzable_int": [ "0", "-1", "999999999", "2147483647", "-2147483648" ], "restler_fuzzable_bool": ["true", "false", "null", "1", "0"], "restler_fuzzable_datetime": [ "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z", "0000-00-00T00:00:00Z", "9999-12-31T23:59:59Z", "invalid-date" ], "restler_fuzzable_uuid4": [ "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000", "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa" ], "restler_custom_payload": { "/users/{userId}": ["1", "0", "-1", "admin", "' OR 1=1--"], "/orders/{orderId}": ["1", "0", "999999999"] } }
python# authentication_token.py - RESTler authentication module import requests import json import time class AuthenticationProvider: def __init__(self): self.token = None self.token_expiry = 0 self.auth_url = "https://target-api.example.com/api/v1/auth/login" self.credentials = { "email": "fuzzer@test.com", "password": "FuzzerPass123!" } def get_token(self): """Get or refresh authentication token.""" current_time = time.time() if self.token and current_time < self.token_expiry - 60: return self.token resp = requests.post(self.auth_url, json=self.credentials) if resp.status_code == 200: data = resp.json() self.token = data["access_token"] self.token_expiry = current_time + 3600 # Assume 1-hour TTL return self.token else: raise Exception(f"Authentication failed: {resp.status_code}") def get_auth_header(self): """Return the authentication header for RESTler.""" token = self.get_token() return f"Authorization: Bearer {token}" # Export the token refresh command for RESTler auth = AuthenticationProvider() print(auth.get_auth_header())
Engine settings for authentication (engine_settings.json):
json{ "authentication": { "token": { "token_refresh_interval": 300, "token_refresh_cmd": "python3 /path/to/authentication_token.py" } }, "max_combinations": 20, "max_request_execution_time": 30, "global_producer_timing_delay": 2, "no_ssl": false, "host": "target-api.example.com", "target_port": 443, "garbage_collection_interval": 300, "max_sequence_length": 10 }
bash# Test mode: Quick validation that all endpoints are reachable /opt/restler/restler/Restler test \ --grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \ --dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \ --settings Compile/engine_settings.json \ --no_ssl \ --target_ip target-api.example.com \ --target_port 443 # Review test results cat Test/ResponseBuckets/runSummary.json
python# Parse test results import json with open("Test/ResponseBuckets/runSummary.json") as f: summary = json.load(f) print("Test Mode Summary:") print(f" Total requests: {summary.get('total_requests_sent', {}).get('num_requests', 0)}") print(f" Successful (2xx): {summary.get('num_fully_valid', 0)}") print(f" Client errors (4xx): {summary.get('num_invalid', 0)}") print(f" Server errors (5xx): {summary.get('num_server_error', 0)}") # Identify uncovered endpoints covered = summary.get('covered_endpoints', []) total = summary.get('total_endpoints', []) uncovered = set(total) - set(covered) if uncovered: print(f"\nUncovered endpoints ({len(uncovered)}):") for ep in uncovered: print(f" - {ep}")
bash# Fuzz-lean: One pass through all endpoints with security checkers enabled /opt/restler/restler/Restler fuzz-lean \ --grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \ --dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \ --settings Compile/engine_settings.json \ --target_ip target-api.example.com \ --target_port 443 \ --time_budget 1 # 1 hour max # Checkers automatically enabled in fuzz-lean: # - UseAfterFree: Tests accessing resources after deletion # - NamespaceRule: Tests accessing resources across namespaces/tenants # - ResourceHierarchy: Tests child resources with wrong parent IDs # - LeakageRule: Tests for information disclosure in error responses # - InvalidDynamicObject: Tests with malformed dynamic object IDs
bash# Full fuzz mode: Extended fuzzing for comprehensive coverage /opt/restler/restler/Restler fuzz \ --grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \ --dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \ --settings Compile/engine_settings.json \ --target_ip target-api.example.com \ --target_port 443 \ --time_budget 4 \ --enable_checkers UseAfterFree NamespaceRule ResourceHierarchy LeakageRule InvalidDynamicObject PayloadBody # Analyze fuzzing results python3 <<'EOF' import json import os results_dir = "Fuzz/ResponseBuckets" bugs_dir = "Fuzz/bug_buckets" # Parse bug buckets if os.path.exists(bugs_dir): for bug_file in os.listdir(bugs_dir): if bug_file.endswith(".txt"): with open(os.path.join(bugs_dir, bug_file)) as f: content = f.read() print(f"\n=== Bug: {bug_file} ===") print(content[:500]) # Parse response summary summary_file = os.path.join(results_dir, "runSummary.json") if os.path.exists(summary_file): with open(summary_file) as f: summary = json.load(f) print(f"\nFuzz Summary:") print(f" Duration: {summary.get('time_budget_hours', 0)} hours") print(f" Total requests: {summary.get('total_requests_sent', {}).get('num_requests', 0)}") print(f" Bugs found: {summary.get('num_bugs', 0)}") print(f" 500 errors: {summary.get('num_server_error', 0)}") EOF
| Term | Definition | |------|------------| | Stateful Fuzzing | API fuzzing that maintains state across requests by using responses from earlier requests as inputs to later ones, enabling testing of multi-step workflows | | Producer-Consumer Dependencies | RESTler's inference that a value produced by one API call (e.g., a created resource ID) should be consumed by a subsequent call | | Fuzzing Grammar | Compiled representation of the API specification that defines how to generate valid and invalid requests for each endpoint | | Checker | RESTler security rule that tests for specific vulnerability patterns like use-after-free, namespace isolation, or information leakage | | Bug Bucket | RESTler's categorization of discovered bugs by type and endpoint, grouping similar failures for efficient triage | | Garbage Collection | RESTler's periodic cleanup of resources created during fuzzing to prevent resource exhaustion on the target system |
Context: A fintech company has 12 microservice APIs with OpenAPI specifications. Before a major release, the security team runs RESTler fuzzing against each service in the staging environment to catch bugs.
Approach:
Pitfalls:
## RESTler API Fuzzing Report
**Target**: User Service API (staging.example.com)
**Specification**: OpenAPI 3.0 (42 endpoints)
**Duration**: 4 hours (full fuzz mode)
**Total Requests**: 145,832
### Bug Summary
| Category | Count | Severity |
|----------|-------|----------|
| 500 Internal Server Error | 12 | High |
| Use After Free | 3 | Critical |
| Namespace Rule Violation | 5 | Critical |
| Information Leakage | 8 | Medium |
| Resource Leak | 4 | Low |
### Critical Findings
**1. Use-After-Free: Deleted user token still valid**
- Sequence: POST /users -> DELETE /users/{id} -> GET /users/{id}
- After deleting user, GET with the deleted user's token returns 200
- Impact: Deleted accounts can still access the API
**2. Namespace Violation: Cross-tenant data access**
- Sequence: POST /users (tenant A) -> GET /users/{id} (tenant B token)
- User created by tenant A is accessible with tenant B's credentials
- Impact: Multi-tenant isolation breach
**3. 500 Error: Unhandled integer overflow**
- Request: POST /orders {"quantity": 2147483648}
- Response: 500 Internal Server Error with stack trace
- Impact: DoS potential, information disclosure via stack trace
### Coverage
- Endpoints covered: 38/42 (90.5%)
- Uncovered: POST /admin/migrate, DELETE /admin/cache,
PUT /config/advanced, POST /webhooks/test| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +14 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.