Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Monitor for brand impersonation attacks across domains, social media, mobile apps, and dark web channels to detect phishing campaigns, fake sites, and unauthorized brand usage targeting your organization.
.claude/skills/performing-brand-monitoring-for-impersonation/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-17 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
Brand impersonation attacks exploit consumer trust through lookalike domains, fake social media profiles, counterfeit mobile apps, and phishing sites that mimic legitimate brands. In 2025, brand impersonation remained one of the most costly cyber threats, with AI-generated phishing emails achieving a 54% click-through rate. This skill covers building a comprehensive brand monitoring program that detects domain squatting, social media impersonation, fake mobile apps, unauthorized logo usage, and dark web brand mentions using automated scanning and alerting.
dnstwist, requests, beautifulsoup4, Levenshtein, tweepy librariesBrand impersonation spans multiple channels: domain squatting (typosquatting, homoglyphs, TLD variations), phishing sites (cloned websites with stolen branding), social media (fake profiles impersonating executives or company), mobile apps (counterfeit apps in app stores), email spoofing (display name and domain impersonation), and dark web (brand mentions in forums, marketplaces).
Effective brand monitoring combines proactive scanning (domain permutation with dnstwist, CT log monitoring), web crawling (screenshot comparison, logo detection), social media monitoring (profile name matching, post content analysis), app store monitoring (name and icon similarity detection), and dark web monitoring (forum scraping, marketplace tracking).
Not all impersonation is malicious. Risk factors include: active web content (especially login pages), SSL certificate present, MX records configured (email receiving capability), visual similarity to legitimate site, recent registration date, and hosting in regions associated with cybercrime.
pythonimport subprocess import requests import json from datetime import datetime from urllib.parse import urlparse import Levenshtein class BrandMonitor: def __init__(self, brand_config): self.brand_name = brand_config["name"] self.domains = brand_config["domains"] self.keywords = brand_config["keywords"] self.executive_names = brand_config.get("executives", []) self.logo_hash = brand_config.get("logo_hash", "") self.findings = [] def scan_domain_squatting(self): """Detect typosquatting and lookalike domains.""" all_results = [] for domain in self.domains: cmd = ["dnstwist", "--registered", "--format", "json", "--nameservers", "8.8.8.8", "--threads", "30", domain] try: result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=300) if result.returncode == 0: domains = json.loads(result.stdout) registered = [d for d in domains if d.get("dns_a") or d.get("dns_aaaa")] all_results.extend(registered) print(f"[+] Domain squatting scan for {domain}: " f"{len(registered)} registered lookalikes") except (subprocess.TimeoutExpired, Exception) as e: print(f"[-] Error scanning {domain}: {e}") for entry in all_results: self.findings.append({ "type": "domain_squatting", "indicator": entry.get("domain", ""), "fuzzer": entry.get("fuzzer", ""), "dns_a": entry.get("dns_a", []), "ssdeep_score": entry.get("ssdeep_score", 0), "detected_at": datetime.now().isoformat(), }) return all_results def check_google_safe_browsing(self, urls, api_key): """Check URLs against Google Safe Browsing API.""" url = f"https://safebrowsing.googleapis.com/v4/threatMatches:find?key={api_key}" body = { "client": {"clientId": "brand-monitor", "clientVersion": "1.0"}, "threatInfo": { "threatTypes": ["MALWARE", "SOCIAL_ENGINEERING", "UNWANTED_SOFTWARE"], "platformTypes": ["ANY_PLATFORM"], "threatEntryTypes": ["URL"], "threatEntries": [{"url": u} for u in urls], }, } resp = requests.post(url, json=body, timeout=15) if resp.status_code == 200: matches = resp.json().get("matches", []) print(f"[+] Google Safe Browsing: {len(matches)} threats found") return matches return [] def monitor_social_media_impersonation(self, platform="twitter"): """Detect social media profiles impersonating brand or executives.""" suspicious_profiles = [] # Search for profiles with similar names for name in self.executive_names + [self.brand_name]: # Using a general search approach search_url = f"https://api.twitter.com/2/users/by/username/{name.replace(' ', '')}" # Note: In production, use authenticated Twitter API suspicious_profiles.append({ "search_term": name, "platform": platform, "note": "Requires authenticated API access for full search", }) return suspicious_profiles def monitor_app_stores(self): """Check for fake mobile apps impersonating the brand.""" fake_apps = [] for keyword in self.keywords: # Google Play Store search (unofficial) url = f"https://play.google.com/store/search?q={keyword}&c=apps" try: resp = requests.get(url, timeout=15, headers={ "User-Agent": "Mozilla/5.0" }) if resp.status_code == 200: # Parse results for brand name matches from bs4 import BeautifulSoup soup = BeautifulSoup(resp.text, "html.parser") app_links = soup.find_all("a", href=lambda h: h and "/store/apps/details" in h) for link in app_links: app_name = link.get_text(strip=True) if any(k.lower() in app_name.lower() for k in self.keywords): fake_apps.append({ "name": app_name, "url": f"https://play.google.com{link['href']}", "platform": "google_play", "keyword": keyword, }) except Exception as e: print(f"[-] App store search error: {e}") return fake_apps def generate_monitoring_report(self): report = { "brand": self.brand_name, "generated": datetime.now().isoformat(), "total_findings": len(self.findings), "findings_by_type": {}, "high_priority": [], } for finding in self.findings: ftype = finding["type"] if ftype not in report["findings_by_type"]: report["findings_by_type"][ftype] = 0 report["findings_by_type"][ftype] += 1 # High priority: has web similarity or MX records if finding.get("ssdeep_score", 0) > 50: report["high_priority"].append(finding) with open(f"brand_monitoring_{self.brand_name.lower()}.json", "w") as f: json.dump(report, f, indent=2) print(f"[+] Brand monitoring report: {len(self.findings)} findings") return report monitor = BrandMonitor({ "name": "MyCompany", "domains": ["mycompany.com", "mycompany.org"], "keywords": ["mycompany", "mybrand", "myproduct"], "executives": ["CEO Name", "CTO Name"], }) monitor.scan_domain_squatting() report = monitor.generate_monitoring_report()
pythondef generate_takedown_request(finding, brand_info): """Generate abuse report for domain/site takedown.""" request = f"""Subject: Abuse Report - Brand Impersonation / Phishing Dear Abuse Team, We are writing to report a domain that is impersonating {brand_info['name']} for apparent phishing/fraud purposes. Infringing Domain: {finding.get('indicator', '')} IP Address: {', '.join(finding.get('dns_a', ['Unknown']))} Detection Method: {finding.get('fuzzer', 'domain similarity analysis')} Web Similarity Score: {finding.get('ssdeep_score', 'N/A')}% Detection Date: {finding.get('detected_at', '')} Our legitimate domain(s): {', '.join(brand_info['domains'])} This domain appears to be impersonating our brand through {finding.get('fuzzer', 'typosquatting')}. We request immediate suspension of this domain. Evidence of infringement is available upon request. Regards, {brand_info['name']} Security Team """ return request
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.