Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Leverage the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog alongside EPSS and CVSS to prioritize CVE remediation based on real-world exploitation evidence.
.claude/skills/performing-cve-prioritization-with-kev-catalog/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
The CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, established through Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01, is a living list of CVEs that have been actively exploited in the wild and carry significant risk. As of early 2026, the catalog contains over 1,484 entries, growing 20% in 2025 alone with 245 new additions. This skill covers integrating the KEV catalog into vulnerability prioritization workflows alongside EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) and CVSS to create a risk-based approach that prioritizes vulnerabilities with confirmed exploitation activity over theoretical severity alone.
Each KEV entry contains:
| CVE Publication Date | Remediation Deadline | |----------------------|---------------------| | 2021 or later | 2 weeks from KEV listing | | Before 2021 | 6 months from KEV listing |
| Factor | Weight | Data Source | Rationale | |--------|--------|-------------|-----------| | CISA KEV Listed | 30% | CISA KEV JSON feed | Confirmed active exploitation | | EPSS Score | 25% | FIRST EPSS API | Predicted exploitation probability | | CVSS Base Score | 20% | NVD API v2.0 | Intrinsic vulnerability severity | | Asset Criticality | 15% | CMDB/Asset inventory | Business impact context | | Network Exposure | 10% | Network architecture | Attack surface accessibility |
| KEV Listed | EPSS > 0.5 | CVSS >= 9.0 | Priority | SLA | |------------|-----------|-------------|----------|-----| | Yes | Any | Any | P1-Emergency | 48 hours | | No | Yes | Yes | P1-Emergency | 48 hours | | No | Yes | No | P2-Critical | 7 days | | No | No | Yes | P2-Critical | 7 days | | No | No | No (>= 7.0) | P3-High | 14 days | | No | No | No (>= 4.0) | P4-Medium | 30 days | | No | No | No (< 4.0) | P5-Low | 90 days |
pythonimport requests import json from datetime import datetime KEV_URL = "https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json" def fetch_kev_catalog(): """Download and parse the CISA KEV catalog.""" response = requests.get(KEV_URL, timeout=30) response.raise_for_status() data = response.json() catalog = {} for vuln in data.get("vulnerabilities", []): cve_id = vuln["cveID"] catalog[cve_id] = { "vendor": vuln.get("vendorProject", ""), "product": vuln.get("product", ""), "name": vuln.get("vulnerabilityName", ""), "date_added": vuln.get("dateAdded", ""), "description": vuln.get("shortDescription", ""), "action": vuln.get("requiredAction", ""), "due_date": vuln.get("dueDate", ""), "ransomware_use": vuln.get("knownRansomwareCampaignUse", "Unknown"), } print(f"[+] Loaded {len(catalog)} CVEs from CISA KEV catalog") print(f" Catalog version: {data.get('catalogVersion', 'N/A')}") print(f" Last updated: {data.get('dateReleased', 'N/A')}") return catalog kev = fetch_kev_catalog()
pythonEPSS_API = "https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss" def get_epss_scores(cve_list): """Fetch EPSS scores for a batch of CVEs.""" scores = {} batch_size = 100 for i in range(0, len(cve_list), batch_size): batch = cve_list[i:i + batch_size] cve_param = ",".join(batch) response = requests.get(EPSS_API, params={"cve": cve_param}, timeout=30) if response.status_code == 200: for entry in response.json().get("data", []): scores[entry["cve"]] = { "epss": float(entry.get("epss", 0)), "percentile": float(entry.get("percentile", 0)), } return scores
pythonimport pandas as pd def prioritize_vulnerabilities(scan_results, kev_catalog, epss_scores): """Apply multi-factor prioritization to scan results.""" prioritized = [] for vuln in scan_results: cve_id = vuln.get("cve_id", "") cvss_score = float(vuln.get("cvss_score", 0)) asset_criticality = float(vuln.get("asset_criticality", 3)) exposure = float(vuln.get("network_exposure", 3)) in_kev = cve_id in kev_catalog kev_data = kev_catalog.get(cve_id, {}) epss_data = epss_scores.get(cve_id, {"epss": 0, "percentile": 0}) epss_score = epss_data["epss"] # Composite risk score calculation risk_score = ( (1.0 if in_kev else 0.0) * 10 * 0.30 + epss_score * 10 * 0.25 + cvss_score * 0.20 + (asset_criticality / 5.0) * 10 * 0.15 + (exposure / 5.0) * 10 * 0.10 ) # Assign priority level if in_kev or (epss_score > 0.5 and cvss_score >= 9.0): priority = "P1-Emergency" sla_days = 2 elif epss_score > 0.5 or cvss_score >= 9.0: priority = "P2-Critical" sla_days = 7 elif cvss_score >= 7.0: priority = "P3-High" sla_days = 14 elif cvss_score >= 4.0: priority = "P4-Medium" sla_days = 30 else: priority = "P5-Low" sla_days = 90 prioritized.append({ "cve_id": cve_id, "cvss_score": cvss_score, "epss_score": round(epss_score, 4), "epss_percentile": round(epss_data["percentile"], 4), "in_cisa_kev": in_kev, "ransomware_use": kev_data.get("ransomware_use", "N/A"), "kev_due_date": kev_data.get("due_date", "N/A"), "risk_score": round(risk_score, 2), "priority": priority, "sla_days": sla_days, "asset": vuln.get("asset", ""), "asset_criticality": asset_criticality, }) df = pd.DataFrame(prioritized) df = df.sort_values("risk_score", ascending=False) return df
pythondef generate_report(df, output_file="kev_prioritized_report.csv"): """Generate summary report from prioritized vulnerabilities.""" print("\n" + "=" * 70) print("VULNERABILITY PRIORITIZATION REPORT - KEV + EPSS + CVSS") print("=" * 70) print(f"\nTotal vulnerabilities analyzed: {len(df)}") print(f"KEV-listed vulnerabilities: {df['in_cisa_kev'].sum()}") print(f"Ransomware-associated: {(df['ransomware_use'] == 'Known').sum()}") print("\nPriority Distribution:") print(df["priority"].value_counts().to_string()) print("\nTop 15 Highest Risk Vulnerabilities:") top = df.head(15)[["cve_id", "cvss_score", "epss_score", "in_cisa_kev", "risk_score", "priority"]] print(top.to_string(index=False)) df.to_csv(output_file, index=False) print(f"\n[+] Full report saved to: {output_file}")
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +50 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.