Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Indicator lifecycle management tracks IOCs from initial discovery through validation, enrichment, deployment, monitoring, and eventual retirement. This skill covers implementing systematic processes f
.claude/skills/performing-indicator-lifecycle-management/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Indicator lifecycle management tracks IOCs from initial discovery through validation, enrichment, deployment, monitoring, and eventual retirement. This skill covers implementing systematic processes for IOC quality assessment, aging policies, confidence scoring decay, false positive tracking, hit-rate monitoring, and automated expiration to maintain a high-quality, actionable indicator database that minimizes analyst fatigue and maximizes detection efficacy.
pymisp, requests, stix2 librariesIndicator confidence decreases over time as adversaries rotate infrastructure. A time-based decay function reduces confidence scores automatically, ensuring old indicators do not generate excessive alerts. Typical half-life: IP addresses (30 days), domains (90 days), file hashes (365 days).
pythonfrom datetime import datetime, timedelta from enum import Enum class IOCState(Enum): DISCOVERED = "discovered" VALIDATED = "validated" ENRICHED = "enriched" DEPLOYED = "deployed" MONITORING = "monitoring" UNDER_REVIEW = "under_review" RETIRED = "retired" class IOCLifecycle: def __init__(self, ioc_type, value, source, initial_confidence=50): self.ioc_type = ioc_type self.value = value self.source = source self.confidence = initial_confidence self.state = IOCState.DISCOVERED self.created = datetime.utcnow() self.last_updated = datetime.utcnow() self.last_seen = None self.hit_count = 0 self.false_positive_count = 0 self.history = [{"state": "discovered", "timestamp": self.created.isoformat()}] def transition(self, new_state: IOCState, reason=""): self.state = new_state self.last_updated = datetime.utcnow() self.history.append({ "state": new_state.value, "timestamp": self.last_updated.isoformat(), "reason": reason, }) def apply_decay(self): """Apply confidence decay based on IOC type half-life.""" half_lives = {"ip": 30, "domain": 90, "hash": 365, "url": 60} half_life = half_lives.get(self.ioc_type, 90) age_days = (datetime.utcnow() - self.created).days decay_factor = 0.5 ** (age_days / half_life) self.confidence = max(0, int(self.confidence * decay_factor)) def record_hit(self, is_true_positive=True): self.hit_count += 1 self.last_seen = datetime.utcnow() if not is_true_positive: self.false_positive_count += 1 if self.false_positive_count > 3: self.transition(IOCState.UNDER_REVIEW, "Excessive false positives") def should_retire(self): max_ages = {"ip": 90, "domain": 180, "hash": 730, "url": 120} max_age = max_ages.get(self.ioc_type, 180) age_days = (datetime.utcnow() - self.created).days return age_days > max_age and self.hit_count == 0
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-24 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 24 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +54 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 24 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.