Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →This skill covers analyzing Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) firmware for security vulnerabilities including hardcoded credentials, insecure update mechanisms, backdoor functions, memory corruption flaws, and undocumented debug interfaces. It addresses firmware extraction from common PLC platforms (Siemens S7, Allen-Bradley, Schneider Modicon), static analysis of firmware images, dynamic analysis in emulated environments, and comparison against known-good baselines to detect tampering.
.claude/skills/performing-plc-firmware-security-analysis/SKILL.md| Model | Eval pass | Runs |
|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | 100% | 5 |
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Do not use on live production PLCs without explicit authorization and safety controls in place. Firmware extraction and analysis should be performed on lab devices or offline backups. Never upload PLC firmware to public analysis services. See performing-ics-penetration-testing for authorized live testing procedures.
Extract or obtain PLC firmware through authorized methods. This can be done by downloading from the vendor, extracting from a lab device, or obtaining from a project backup.
python#!/usr/bin/env python3 """PLC Firmware Acquisition and Integrity Verification. Supports firmware extraction from project files, network downloads, and binary image comparison against known-good baselines. """ import hashlib import json import os import struct import sys import zipfile from datetime import datetime from pathlib import Path class PLCFirmwareAcquisition: """Handles PLC firmware acquisition from various sources.""" def __init__(self, output_dir="firmware_analysis"): self.output_dir = Path(output_dir) self.output_dir.mkdir(exist_ok=True) self.manifest = { "acquisition_date": datetime.now().isoformat(), "firmware_samples": [], } def extract_from_siemens_project(self, project_path): """Extract firmware/program blocks from Siemens TIA Portal project. TIA Portal projects (.ap16/.ap17) are ZIP archives containing XML-encoded PLC program blocks and system configuration. """ print(f"[*] Analyzing Siemens project: {project_path}") results = {"platform": "Siemens", "blocks": []} if zipfile.is_zipfile(project_path): with zipfile.ZipFile(project_path, "r") as zf: for info in zf.infolist(): # Program blocks are stored as XML in specific paths if "ProgramBlocks" in info.filename or "SystemBlocks" in info.filename: block_data = zf.read(info.filename) block_hash = hashlib.sha256(block_data).hexdigest() block_path = self.output_dir / info.filename.replace("/", "_") block_path.write_bytes(block_data) results["blocks"].append({ "name": info.filename, "size": info.file_size, "sha256": block_hash, "extracted_to": str(block_path), }) print(f" [+] Extracted: {info.filename} ({info.file_size} bytes)") self.manifest["firmware_samples"].append(results) return results def extract_from_rockwell_project(self, acd_path): """Extract program data from Rockwell Studio 5000 ACD file. ACD files contain controller program, tags, and configuration. """ print(f"[*] Analyzing Rockwell project: {acd_path}") results = {"platform": "Rockwell/Allen-Bradley", "blocks": []} with open(acd_path, "rb") as f: header = f.read(256) # ACD files have a specific signature if b"RSLogix" in header or b"Studio 5000" in header: f.seek(0) full_data = f.read() file_hash = hashlib.sha256(full_data).hexdigest() results["blocks"].append({ "name": os.path.basename(acd_path), "size": len(full_data), "sha256": file_hash, "header_signature": header[:16].hex(), }) print(f" [+] Project hash: {file_hash}") self.manifest["firmware_samples"].append(results) return results def compute_firmware_hash(self, firmware_path): """Compute multiple hashes of a firmware image for integrity tracking.""" data = Path(firmware_path).read_bytes() return { "file": str(firmware_path), "size": len(data), "md5": hashlib.md5(data).hexdigest(), "sha256": hashlib.sha256(data).hexdigest(), "sha512": hashlib.sha512(data).hexdigest(), } def compare_firmware_integrity(self, current_fw, baseline_fw): """Compare current firmware against known-good baseline.""" current_hash = self.compute_firmware_hash(current_fw) baseline_hash = self.compute_firmware_hash(baseline_fw) match = current_hash["sha256"] == baseline_hash["sha256"] result = { "comparison_date": datetime.now().isoformat(), "current_firmware": current_hash, "baseline_firmware": baseline_hash, "integrity_match": match, "verdict": "PASS - Firmware matches baseline" if match else "FAIL - Firmware modified!", } if not match: # Find the offset where files diverge current_data = Path(current_fw).read_bytes() baseline_data = Path(baseline_fw).read_bytes() min_len = min(len(current_data), len(baseline_data)) first_diff = None diff_count = 0 for i in range(min_len): if current_data[i] != baseline_data[i]: if first_diff is None: first_diff = i diff_count += 1 result["first_difference_offset"] = f"0x{first_diff:08x}" if first_diff else None result["total_different_bytes"] = diff_count result["size_difference"] = len(current_data) - len(baseline_data) return result def save_manifest(self): """Save acquisition manifest.""" manifest_path = self.output_dir / "acquisition_manifest.json" with open(manifest_path, "w") as f: json.dump(self.manifest, f, indent=2) print(f"\n[*] Manifest saved: {manifest_path}") if __name__ == "__main__": acq = PLCFirmwareAcquisition() if len(sys.argv) < 2: print("Usage:") print(" python process.py extract-siemens <project.ap17>") print(" python process.py extract-rockwell <project.acd>") print(" python process.py compare <current.bin> <baseline.bin>") sys.exit(1) cmd = sys.argv[1] if cmd == "extract-siemens" and len(sys.argv) > 2: acq.extract_from_siemens_project(sys.argv[2]) elif cmd == "extract-rockwell" and len(sys.argv) > 2: acq.extract_from_rockwell_project(sys.argv[2]) elif cmd == "compare" and len(sys.argv) > 3: result = acq.compare_firmware_integrity(sys.argv[2], sys.argv[3]) print(json.dumps(result, indent=2)) else: print("Invalid command") sys.exit(1) acq.save_manifest()
Use binwalk for firmware unpacking and Ghidra for disassembly to identify security issues in the firmware binary.
bash# Step 2a: Unpack firmware image with binwalk binwalk -e firmware.bin # Output: _firmware.bin.extracted/ # Identify firmware components binwalk firmware.bin # Look for: file system images, compressed sections, bootloader, RTOS kernel # Extract strings for credential and configuration analysis strings -n 8 firmware.bin > firmware_strings.txt # Search for hardcoded credentials grep -iE "(password|passwd|pwd|secret|key|credential|login|admin|root)" firmware_strings.txt # Search for network configuration grep -iE "(http|ftp|telnet|ssh|snmp|modbus|192\.168|10\.|172\.)" firmware_strings.txt # Search for debug/backdoor indicators grep -iE "(debug|backdoor|test_mode|factory|service_port|hidden)" firmware_strings.txt # Search for cryptographic material grep -iE "(BEGIN RSA|BEGIN CERTIFICATE|AES|DES|private.key)" firmware_strings.txt # Step 2b: Entropy analysis to detect encrypted/compressed sections binwalk -E firmware.bin # High entropy sections may contain encrypted payloads or compressed data # Step 2c: Analyze with Ghidra (headless mode) analyzeHeadless /tmp/ghidra_project PLC_FW \ -import firmware.bin \ -processor ARM:LE:32:Cortex \ -postScript FindCryptoConstants.java \ -postScript FindHardcodedStrings.java \ -log /tmp/ghidra_analysis.log
Examine how the PLC handles industrial protocol requests, focusing on authentication bypass, buffer overflows in packet parsing, and command injection vulnerabilities.
python#!/usr/bin/env python3 """PLC Protocol Security Analyzer. Tests PLC protocol implementation for common vulnerabilities including authentication bypass, malformed packet handling, and function code access control. WARNING: Only run against lab/test PLCs, never production systems. """ import socket import struct import sys import time from dataclasses import dataclass @dataclass class ProtocolTestResult: test_name: str target: str protocol: str result: str # PASS, FAIL, ERROR severity: str detail: str class ModbusSecurityTester: """Tests Modbus/TCP implementation security.""" def __init__(self, target_ip, target_port=502): self.target = target_ip self.port = target_port self.results = [] def _send_modbus(self, unit_id, func_code, data=b""): """Send a Modbus/TCP request and return response.""" # MBAP Header: transaction_id(2) + protocol_id(2) + length(2) + unit_id(1) mbap = struct.pack(">HHHB", 0x0001, 0x0000, len(data) + 2, unit_id) pdu = struct.pack("B", func_code) + data try: sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) sock.settimeout(5) sock.connect((self.target, self.port)) sock.send(mbap + pdu) response = sock.recv(1024) sock.close() return response except Exception as e: return None def test_authentication_required(self): """Test if PLC requires authentication for read/write operations.""" # Test unauthenticated read read_data = struct.pack(">HH", 0, 10) # Read 10 registers from address 0 response = self._send_modbus(1, 3, read_data) if response and len(response) > 8 and response[7] != 0x83: self.results.append(ProtocolTestResult( test_name="Modbus Authentication - Read", target=self.target, protocol="Modbus/TCP", result="FAIL", severity="high", detail="PLC accepts unauthenticated Modbus read commands. No authentication required.", )) # Test unauthenticated write write_data = struct.pack(">HH", 100, 0) # Write 0 to register 100 response = self._send_modbus(1, 6, write_data) if response and len(response) > 8 and response[7] != 0x86: self.results.append(ProtocolTestResult( test_name="Modbus Authentication - Write", target=self.target, protocol="Modbus/TCP", result="FAIL", severity="critical", detail="PLC accepts unauthenticated Modbus WRITE commands. Any host can modify registers.", )) def test_function_code_access_control(self): """Test if PLC restricts dangerous function codes.""" dangerous_funcs = { 8: "Diagnostics (can restart communications)", 17: "Report Slave ID (information disclosure)", 43: "Encapsulated Interface Transport (device identification)", } for fc, desc in dangerous_funcs.items(): response = self._send_modbus(1, fc, b"\x00\x00") if response and len(response) > 8: error_code = response[7] if error_code != (fc | 0x80): # Not an exception response self.results.append(ProtocolTestResult( test_name=f"Function Code Access - FC{fc}", target=self.target, protocol="Modbus/TCP", result="FAIL", severity="medium", detail=f"PLC responds to FC{fc} ({desc}) without access control", )) def test_invalid_unit_id(self): """Test PLC response to broadcast and invalid unit IDs.""" # Broadcast (unit ID 0) - should be carefully handled read_data = struct.pack(">HH", 0, 1) response = self._send_modbus(0, 3, read_data) if response and len(response) > 8 and response[7] != 0x83: self.results.append(ProtocolTestResult( test_name="Broadcast Unit ID Handling", target=self.target, protocol="Modbus/TCP", result="FAIL", severity="high", detail="PLC responds to broadcast unit ID 0. This enables broadcast write attacks.", )) def test_malformed_packet_handling(self): """Test PLC resilience against malformed Modbus packets.""" # Oversized length field malformed = struct.pack(">HHH", 0x0001, 0x0000, 0xFFFF) + b"\x01\x03\x00\x00\x00\x01" try: sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) sock.settimeout(5) sock.connect((self.target, self.port)) sock.send(malformed) time.sleep(1) # Verify PLC is still responsive read_data = struct.pack(">HH", 0, 1) response = self._send_modbus(1, 3, read_data) sock.close() if response is None: self.results.append(ProtocolTestResult( test_name="Malformed Packet - Oversized Length", target=self.target, protocol="Modbus/TCP", result="FAIL", severity="critical", detail="PLC became unresponsive after receiving oversized length field. Possible DoS vulnerability.", )) else: self.results.append(ProtocolTestResult( test_name="Malformed Packet - Oversized Length", target=self.target, protocol="Modbus/TCP", result="PASS", severity="info", detail="PLC correctly handles oversized length field without crashing", )) except Exception as e: pass def run_all_tests(self): """Run all Modbus security tests.""" print(f"\n{'='*60}") print(f"PLC MODBUS SECURITY ANALYSIS - {self.target}:{self.port}") print(f"{'='*60}") self.test_authentication_required() self.test_function_code_access_control() self.test_invalid_unit_id() self.test_malformed_packet_handling() for r in self.results: icon = "[FAIL]" if r.result == "FAIL" else "[PASS]" print(f"\n {icon} {r.test_name}") print(f" Severity: {r.severity}") print(f" Detail: {r.detail}") return self.results if __name__ == "__main__": if len(sys.argv) < 2: print("Usage: python plc_protocol_tester.py <target_plc_ip> [port]") print("WARNING: Only use against lab/test PLCs!") sys.exit(1) target = sys.argv[1] port = int(sys.argv[2]) if len(sys.argv) > 2 else 502 tester = ModbusSecurityTester(target, port) tester.run_all_tests()
| Term | Definition | |------|------------| | PLC Firmware | The embedded software running on a Programmable Logic Controller, including the real-time operating system, protocol stacks, and I/O drivers | | Ladder Logic | Graphical programming language for PLCs that represents relay logic circuits, stored as program blocks in PLC memory | | Function Block | Reusable PLC programming element that encapsulates logic with defined inputs/outputs, can be analyzed for malicious modifications | | Firmware Integrity | Verification that PLC firmware has not been modified from the vendor-supplied or approved version using cryptographic hash comparison | | IEC 62443-4-2 | Component security requirements in the IEC 62443 standard, defining security capabilities required for IACS components including PLCs | | JTAG/SWD | Hardware debug interfaces (Joint Test Action Group / Serial Wire Debug) used for firmware extraction and low-level analysis |
PLC Firmware Security Analysis Report
=======================================
Device: [PLC Model and Firmware Version]
Analysis Date: YYYY-MM-DD
Methodology: Static + Dynamic Analysis
FIRMWARE INTEGRITY:
SHA-256: [hash]
Baseline Match: [Yes/No]
Vendor Signature Valid: [Yes/No/Not Signed]
VULNERABILITIES FOUND:
[PLC-001] [Severity] [Title]
CWE: [CWE-ID]
Detail: [Technical description]
Impact: [Operational impact]
Remediation: [Fix or mitigation]| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-24 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 24 cases were attempted, and 22 counted toward the lift figure. The other 2 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +21 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.