Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Nikto is an open-source web server and web application scanner that tests against over 7,000 potentially dangerous files/programs, checks for outdated versions of over 1,250 servers, and identifies ve
.claude/skills/performing-web-application-scanning-with-nikto/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Nikto is an open-source web server and web application scanner that tests against over 7,000 potentially dangerous files/programs, checks for outdated versions of over 1,250 servers, and identifies version-specific problems on over 270 servers. It performs comprehensive tests including XSS, SQL injection, server misconfigurations, default credentials, and known vulnerable CGI scripts.
| Feature | Nikto | OWASP ZAP | Burp Suite | Nuclei | |---------|-------|-----------|------------|--------| | License | Open Source | Open Source | Commercial | Open Source | | Focus | Server/Config | App Logic | Full Pentest | Template-Based | | Speed | Fast | Medium | Slow | Very Fast | | False Positives | Moderate | Low | Low | Low | | Authentication | Basic | Full | Full | Template | | Active Community | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
bash# Basic scan against a target nikto -h https://target.example.com # Scan specific port nikto -h target.example.com -p 8443 # Scan multiple ports nikto -h target.example.com -p 80,443,8080,8443 # Scan with SSL enforcement nikto -h target.example.com -ssl # Scan from a host list file nikto -h targets.txt
bash# Comprehensive scan with all tuning options nikto -h https://target.example.com \ -Tuning 123456789abcde \ -timeout 10 \ -Pause 2 \ -Display V \ -output report.html \ -Format htm # Tuning options control test types: # 0 - File Upload # 1 - Interesting File / Seen in logs # 2 - Misconfiguration / Default File # 3 - Information Disclosure # 4 - Injection (XSS/Script/HTML) # 5 - Remote File Retrieval - Inside Web Root # 6 - Denial of Service # 7 - Remote File Retrieval - Server Wide # 8 - Command Execution / Remote Shell # 9 - SQL Injection # a - Authentication Bypass # b - Software Identification # c - Remote Source Inclusion # d - WebService # e - Administrative Console # Scan with specific tuning (XSS + SQL injection + auth bypass) nikto -h https://target.example.com -Tuning 49a # Scan with authentication nikto -h https://target.example.com -id admin:password # Scan through a proxy nikto -h https://target.example.com -useproxy http://proxy:8080 # Scan with custom User-Agent nikto -h https://target.example.com -useragent "Mozilla/5.0 (Security Scan)" # Scan specific CGI directories nikto -h https://target.example.com -Cgidirs /cgi-bin/,/scripts/ # Evasion techniques (IDS avoidance for authorized testing) # 1-Random URI encoding, 2-Directory self-reference # 3-Premature URL ending, 4-Prepend long random string nikto -h https://target.example.com -evasion 1234
bash# Generate multiple output formats nikto -h https://target.example.com -output scan.csv -Format csv nikto -h https://target.example.com -output scan.xml -Format xml nikto -h https://target.example.com -output scan.html -Format htm nikto -h https://target.example.com -output scan.txt -Format txt # JSON output (newer versions) nikto -h https://target.example.com -output scan.json -Format json # Save to multiple formats simultaneously nikto -h https://target.example.com \ -output scan_report \ -Format htm
bash# Create targets file (one per line) cat > targets.txt << 'EOF' https://app1.example.com https://app2.example.com:8443 http://internal-app.corp.local 192.168.1.100:8080 EOF # Scan all targets nikto -h targets.txt -output multi_scan.html -Format htm # Parallel scanning with GNU parallel cat targets.txt | parallel -j 5 "nikto -h {} -output {/}_report.html -Format htm"
bash# Comprehensive SSL scan nikto -h https://target.example.com -ssl \ -Tuning b \ -Display V # Check for specific SSL vulnerabilities # Nikto checks for: # - Expired certificates # - Self-signed certificates # - Weak cipher suites # - SSLv2/SSLv3 enabled # - BEAST, POODLE, Heartbleed indicators # - Missing HSTS header
bash# Pipe Nmap results into Nikto nmap -p 80,443,8080 --open -oG - 192.168.1.0/24 | \ awk '/open/{print $2}' | \ while read host; do nikto -h "$host" -output "${host}_nikto.html" -Format htm; done # Export to Metasploit-compatible format nikto -h target.example.com -output msf_import.xml -Format xml # Parse Nikto XML output with Python for custom reporting python3 -c " import xml.etree.ElementTree as ET tree = ET.parse('scan.xml') for item in tree.findall('.//item'): print(f\"[{item.get('id')}] {item.findtext('description', '')[:100]}\") "
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 20 counted toward the lift figure. The other 2 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +32 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 20 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.