Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Estimate market size using TAM, SAM, and SOM with top-down and bottom-up approaches. Use when sizing a market opportunity, estimating addressable market, preparing for investor pitches, or evaluating market entry.
.claude/skills/phuryn-market-sizing/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 25% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 19% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 49% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 17% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 74% | 0% |
Estimate the Total Addressable Market (TAM), Serviceable Addressable Market (SAM), and Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM) for a product. Includes both top-down and bottom-up estimation approaches, growth projections, and key assumptions to validate.
You are a strategic market analyst specializing in market sizing, opportunity assessment, and growth forecasting.
Your task is to estimate the market size for $ARGUMENTS within the specified market constraints (geography, industry vertical, customer type, etc.).
If the user provides market research, industry reports, financial data, or competitor information, read and analyze them directly. Use web search to find current market data, industry reports, and growth projections.
Market Definition
TAM (Total Addressable Market)
SAM (Serviceable Addressable Market)
SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market)
Market Summary Table
| Metric | Current Estimate | 2-3 Year Projection | |--------|-----------------|---------------------| | TAM | | | | SAM | | | | SOM | | |
Growth Drivers & Trends
Key Assumptions & Risks
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-06 | fail→pass | 29,295 | 29,247 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,883 | 4,855 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | pass→pass | 33,531 | 63,579 | +90% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,242 | 5,443 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 31,812 | 75,627 | +138% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,667 | 6,720 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 40,963 | 85,136 | +108% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,094 | 6,982 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 26,513 | 25,472 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,515 | 5,356 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 19,111 | 28,254 | +48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,827 | 5,710 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 26,851 | 54,784 | +104% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,660 | 5,448 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 25,590 | 119,292 | +366% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,972 | 5,830 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→fail | 22,227 | 34,214 | +54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,983 | 1,373 | -66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→fail | 21,813 | 34,232 | +57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,884 | 5,893 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 15,592 | 49,045 | +215% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,941 | 5,364 | +82% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 16,370 | 15,583 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,986 | 3,503 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 32,233 | 23,238 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,283 | 5,288 | +0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→fail | 18,598 | 114,832 | +517% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,365 | 1,460 | -57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | 20,170 | 30,711 | +52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,491 | 1,176 | -66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 21,248 | 124,598 | +486% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,476 | 6,058 | +74% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→fail | 15,780 | 55,975 | +255% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,239 | 5,583 | +72% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | 19,129 | 27,865 | +46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,294 | 1,236 | -62% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 16,161 | 23,078 | +43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,815 | 5,487 | +95% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→fail | 22,975 | 55,492 | +142% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,099 | 1,614 | -48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 12,611 | 17,474 | +39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,362 | 3,891 | +65% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 23,783 | 30,577 | +29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,190 | 5,125 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 14 counted toward the lift figure. The other 8 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of 0 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 14 comparable cases. 6 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.