Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Use when rewriting a government notice, letter, or form into federal plain-language style — the kind of dense, "shall"-laden agency prose (tax notices, benefits letters, permit conditions, hearing summons) that readers can't follow. Applies the adopted federal conventions — address the reader as "you" and the agency as "we", active voice, present tense, "must" for obligations instead of "shall", no hidden verbs or legalese — while keeping every legal obligation, deadline, dollar amount, and citation exactly as written. Do NOT use for reading-grade targeting by syllable count (that is reading-level-adapt), passive-voice-only review (active-voice-audit), or translation between languages.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 263% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 626% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 274% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | 519% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | 315% | 0% |
Rewrite the agency's prose so an ordinary reader understands it on the first read, applying the conventions adopted under the Plain Writing Act. The rewrite must not change a single legal obligation, deadline, amount, exception, or citation. Simplify the language, never the legal effect.
If simplifying would blur a duty or drop a condition, keep the duty and simplify around it. Fidelity beats fluency.
Pronouns — name the two humans. Address the reader as you and the agency as we. Replace "the applicant / the taxpayer / the recipient / the above-named individual" with "you"; replace "the Department / the Service / this office / the Agency" with "we".
Modal verbs — the obligation ladder. This is the highest-value move and the one base models get wrong. Map by the legal function, not word-for-word:
| Source | Means | Rewrite to | |--------|-------|-----------| | "shall" (a duty on a party) | requirement | must | | "shall not" | prohibition | must not | | "shall" (the agency's own future action, no duty on reader) | simple futurity | will | | "is required to" / "is directed to" / "is obligated to" | requirement | must | | "may" | permission | may (keep) | | "should" | recommendation | should (keep) |
Never soften a "shall"-duty to "should" or "may" — that changes who owes what. Never harden pure futurity ("the refund shall be mailed") into "must"; it becomes "will".
Active voice + present tense. Put the doer in front of the verb: "A determination will be made by the office" → "We will decide". Use present tense for standing rules: "will be considered eligible" → "you qualify".
Kill hidden verbs (nominalizations). A buried verb wearing a noun costume, usually behind "make / provide / give / conduct an ___". Unbury it: "make an application" → "apply", "provide notification" → "notify (tell us)", "make a payment" → "pay", "give consideration to" → "consider", "conduct a review of" → "review", "is in violation of" → "violates".
Swap legalese for plain words. "pursuant to" → "under", "prior to" → "before", "subsequent to" → "after", "in the event that" → "if", "at this point in time" → "now", "in order to" → "to", "herein / hereby / heretofore" → cut, "utilize" → "use", "furnish" → "give / send". (Full catalog: references/substitutions.md.)
Short sentences, one idea each. Break run-ons at "and / or / provided that / in which case". A sentence carrying a deadline and a condition and an address becomes three sentences — but all three facts stay.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.