Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →plugin87/design-review
Review or audit a design/UI across 6 weighted dimensions with Nielsen's 10 heuristics and a prioritized findings table.
Passed 17 of 21 test cases with the skill, and 12 of 21 without it.
and 5 more in the full report
6 fixed11 passed either way3 still failing1 broke1 errored
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 6 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
What is the mandatory first file read step when initiating a structured design review flow after checking kit presence?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response specifies reading the design-review workflow markdown file containing rubrics and scoring guides. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Step 0 — is the kit here? This skill reads files from the kit. Check once:
ls ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../tokens >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo KIT_OK || echo KIT_MISSINGOnKIT_MISSINGonly the skill folders were installed, which is whatnpx skills adddoes. Say so plainly, point the user atnpx ux-ui-agent-skills initor the plugin install, and stop. Do not guess the contents of a file you could not open.
Run a structured, scored review.
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../workflows/design-review.md (rubric, scoring guide, Nielsen heuristics, process).${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../accessibility/wcag-checklist.md; use ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../scripts/contrast.py for any color-pair doubts.${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../../taste/design-taste.md (Banned Defaults checklist).test cases passed, vs 12 / 21 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.