Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Extract, analyze, and visualize simulation output data. Use for field extraction, time series analysis, line profiles, statistical summaries, derived quantity computation, result comparison to references, and automated report generation from simulation results.
.claude/skills/post-processing/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-24 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Analyze and extract meaningful information from simulation output data.
Transform raw simulation output into actionable insights through field extraction, statistical analysis, derived quantities, visualizations, and comparison with reference data.
Before running post-processing scripts, collect:
| Script | Purpose | Key Inputs | |--------|---------|------------| | field_extractor.py | Extract field data from output files | --input, --field, --timestep | | time_series_analyzer.py | Analyze temporal evolution | --input, --quantity, --window | | profile_extractor.py | Extract line profiles | --input, --field, --start, --end | | statistical_analyzer.py | Compute field statistics | --input, --field, --region | | derived_quantities.py | Calculate derived quantities | --input, --quantity, --params | | comparison_tool.py | Compare to reference data | --simulation, --reference, --metric | | report_generator.py | Generate summary reports | --input, --template, --output |
First, understand what data is available:
bash# List available fields and timesteps python scripts/field_extractor.py --input results/ --list --json
Extract spatial field data at specific timesteps:
bash# Extract concentration field at timestep 100 python scripts/field_extractor.py \ --input results/field_0100.json \ --field concentration \ --json # Extract multiple fields python scripts/field_extractor.py \ --input results/field_0100.json \ --field "phi,concentration,temperature" \ --json
Analyze temporal evolution of quantities:
bash# Extract total energy vs time python scripts/time_series_analyzer.py \ --input results/history.json \ --quantity total_energy \ --json # Compute moving average with window python scripts/time_series_analyzer.py \ --input results/history.json \ --quantity mass \ --window 10 \ --json # Detect steady state python scripts/time_series_analyzer.py \ --input results/history.json \ --quantity residual \ --detect-steady-state \ --tolerance 1e-6 \ --json
Extract 1D profiles through the domain:
bash# Extract profile along x-axis at y=0.5 python scripts/profile_extractor.py \ --input results/field_0100.json \ --field concentration \ --start "0,0.5,0" \ --end "1,0.5,0" \ --points 100 \ --json # Interface profile (through center) python scripts/profile_extractor.py \ --input results/field_0100.json \ --field phi \ --axis x \ --slice-position 0.5 \ --json
Compute statistics over field data:
bash# Global statistics python scripts/statistical_analyzer.py \ --input results/field_0100.json \ --field concentration \ --json # Statistics in specific region python scripts/statistical_analyzer.py \ --input results/field_0100.json \ --field phi \ --region "x>0.3 and x<0.7" \ --json # Distribution analysis python scripts/statistical_analyzer.py \ --input results/field_0100.json \ --field phi \ --histogram \ --bins 50 \ --json
Calculate physical quantities from raw data:
bash# Compute interface area python scripts/derived_quantities.py \ --input results/field_0100.json \ --quantity interface_area \ --threshold 0.5 \ --json # Compute gradient magnitude python scripts/derived_quantities.py \ --input results/field_0100.json \ --quantity gradient_magnitude \ --field phi \ --json # Compute volume fractions python scripts/derived_quantities.py \ --input results/field_0100.json \ --quantity volume_fraction \ --field phi \ --threshold 0.5 \ --json # Compute flux through boundary python scripts/derived_quantities.py \ --input results/field_0100.json \ --quantity boundary_flux \ --field concentration \ --boundary "x=0" \ --json
Compare simulation results to reference data:
bash# Compare to analytical solution python scripts/comparison_tool.py \ --simulation results/profile.json \ --reference reference/analytical.json \ --metric l2_error \ --json # Compare to experimental data python scripts/comparison_tool.py \ --simulation results/history.json \ --reference experimental_data.csv \ --metric rmse \ --interpolate \ --json # Compare two simulations python scripts/comparison_tool.py \ --simulation results_fine/field.json \ --reference results_coarse/field.json \ --metric max_difference \ --json
Generate automated reports:
bash# Generate summary report python scripts/report_generator.py \ --input results/ \ --output report.json \ --json # Generate with specific sections python scripts/report_generator.py \ --input results/ \ --sections "summary,statistics,convergence" \ --output report.json \ --json
For a complete simulation analysis:
bash# Step 1: Inventory available data python scripts/field_extractor.py --input results/ --list --json # Step 2: Extract final state statistics python scripts/statistical_analyzer.py \ --input results/field_final.json \ --field phi \ --json # Step 3: Analyze convergence history python scripts/time_series_analyzer.py \ --input results/history.json \ --quantity residual \ --detect-steady-state \ --json # Step 4: Compute derived quantities python scripts/derived_quantities.py \ --input results/field_final.json \ --quantity volume_fraction \ --field phi \ --json # Step 5: Compare to reference (if available) python scripts/comparison_tool.py \ --simulation results/profile.json \ --reference benchmark/expected.json \ --metric l2_error \ --json # Step 6: Generate summary report python scripts/report_generator.py \ --input results/ \ --output analysis_report.json \ --json
| Metric | Interpretation | |--------|----------------| | L2 error < 1% | Excellent agreement | | L2 error 1-5% | Good agreement | | L2 error 5-10% | Moderate agreement | | L2 error > 10% | Poor agreement, investigate |
All scripts support --json flag for machine-readable output:
json{ "script": "field_extractor", "version": "1.0.0", "input_file": "results/field_0100.json", "field": "concentration", "data": { "shape": [100, 100], "min": 0.1, "max": 0.9, "mean": 0.5 }, "values": [[...], [...]] }
For detailed information, see:
references/data_formats.md - Supported input/output formatsreferences/statistical_methods.md - Statistical analysis methodsreferences/derived_quantities_guide.md - Physical quantity calculationsreferences/comparison_metrics.md - Error metrics and interpretation| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-24 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-25 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 25 cases were attempted, and 18 counted toward the lift figure. The other 7 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +64 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 18 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.