Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →PostgreSQL-specific code review assistant focusing on PostgreSQL best practices, anti-patterns, and unique quality standards. Covers JSONB operations, array usage, custom types, schema design, function optimization, and PostgreSQL-exclusive security features like Row Level Security (RLS).
.claude/skills/postgresql-code-review/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Expert PostgreSQL code review for ${selection} (or entire project if no selection). Focus on PostgreSQL-specific best practices, anti-patterns, and quality standards that are unique to PostgreSQL.
sql-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient JSONB usage SELECT * FROM orders WHERE data->>'status' = 'shipped'; -- No index support -- ✅ GOOD: Indexable JSONB queries CREATE INDEX idx_orders_status ON orders USING gin((data->'status')); SELECT * FROM orders WHERE data @> '{"status": "shipped"}'; -- ❌ BAD: Deep nesting without consideration UPDATE orders SET data = data || '{"shipping":{"tracking":{"number":"123"}}}'; -- ✅ GOOD: Structured JSONB with validation ALTER TABLE orders ADD CONSTRAINT valid_status CHECK (data->>'status' IN ('pending', 'shipped', 'delivered'));
sql-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient array operations SELECT * FROM products WHERE 'electronics' = ANY(categories); -- No index -- ✅ GOOD: GIN indexed array queries CREATE INDEX idx_products_categories ON products USING gin(categories); SELECT * FROM products WHERE categories @> ARRAY['electronics']; -- ❌ BAD: Array concatenation in loops -- This would be inefficient in a function/procedure -- ✅ GOOD: Bulk array operations UPDATE products SET categories = categories || ARRAY['new_category'] WHERE id IN (SELECT id FROM products WHERE condition);
sql-- ❌ BAD: Not using PostgreSQL features CREATE TABLE users ( id INTEGER, email VARCHAR(255), created_at TIMESTAMP ); -- ✅ GOOD: PostgreSQL-optimized schema CREATE TABLE users ( id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY, email CITEXT UNIQUE NOT NULL, -- Case-insensitive email created_at TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT NOW(), metadata JSONB DEFAULT '{}', CONSTRAINT valid_email CHECK (email ~* '^[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}$') ); -- Add JSONB GIN index for metadata queries CREATE INDEX idx_users_metadata ON users USING gin(metadata);
sql-- ❌ BAD: Using generic types for specific data CREATE TABLE transactions ( amount DECIMAL(10,2), currency VARCHAR(3), status VARCHAR(20) ); -- ✅ GOOD: PostgreSQL custom types CREATE TYPE currency_code AS ENUM ('USD', 'EUR', 'GBP', 'JPY'); CREATE TYPE transaction_status AS ENUM ('pending', 'completed', 'failed', 'cancelled'); CREATE DOMAIN positive_amount AS DECIMAL(10,2) CHECK (VALUE > 0); CREATE TABLE transactions ( amount positive_amount NOT NULL, currency currency_code NOT NULL, status transaction_status DEFAULT 'pending' );
sql-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient trigger function CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_modified_time() RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$ BEGIN NEW.updated_at = NOW(); -- Should use TIMESTAMPTZ RETURN NEW; END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql; -- ✅ GOOD: Optimized trigger function CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_modified_time() RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$ BEGIN NEW.updated_at = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP; RETURN NEW; END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql; -- Set trigger to fire only when needed CREATE TRIGGER update_modified_time_trigger BEFORE UPDATE ON table_name FOR EACH ROW WHEN (OLD.* IS DISTINCT FROM NEW.*) EXECUTE FUNCTION update_modified_time();
sql-- ✅ Check if extension exists before creating CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "uuid-ossp"; CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "pgcrypto"; CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "pg_trgm"; -- ✅ Use extensions appropriately -- UUID generation SELECT uuid_generate_v4(); -- Password hashing SELECT crypt('password', gen_salt('bf')); -- Fuzzy text matching SELECT word_similarity('postgres', 'postgre');
sql-- ✅ GOOD: Implementing RLS ALTER TABLE sensitive_data ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY; CREATE POLICY user_data_policy ON sensitive_data FOR ALL TO application_role USING (user_id = current_setting('app.current_user_id')::INTEGER);
sql-- ❌ BAD: Overly broad permissions GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO app_user; -- ✅ GOOD: Granular permissions GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE ON specific_table TO app_user; GRANT USAGE ON SEQUENCE specific_table_id_seq TO app_user;
Focus on PostgreSQL's unique capabilities and ensure the code leverages what makes PostgreSQL special rather than treating it as a generic SQL database.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.