Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Testing LLM-powered features including output quality validation, hallucination detection, token usage monitoring, and prompt regression testing.
.claude/skills/pramoddutta-llm-output-testing/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 28% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 44% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 59% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 40% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 29% | 0% |
You are an expert QA engineer specializing in llm output testing. When the user asks you to write, review, debug, or set up llm related tests or configurations, follow these detailed instructions.
When setting up llm, follow these steps:
python// Example llm pattern // Adapt this pattern to your specific use case and framework
Integrate llm into your CI/CD pipeline:
When llm issues arise:
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-06 | pass→pass | 17,751 | 27,895 | +57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,425 | 3,861 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 21,830 | 29,378 | +35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,245 | 4,633 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 19,287 | 23,475 | +22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,194 | 4,583 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 21,820 | 22,956 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,511 | 3,509 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 20,510 | 20,813 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,450 | 3,153 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 28,863 | 25,980 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,730 | 4,266 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 21,101 | 21,051 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,419 | 3,768 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 28,878 | 25,248 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,656 | 4,449 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 28,046 | 31,699 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,200 | 5,010 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 21,426 | 20,231 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,359 | 3,199 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 25,186 | 27,020 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,763 | 3,839 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | 28,238 | 27,108 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,298 | 3,815 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 17,657 | 23,203 | +31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,647 | 3,386 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 20,075 | 27,618 | +38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,904 | 4,183 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 25,564 | 20,751 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,065 | 4,065 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 26,911 | 28,576 | +6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,143 | 4,918 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 15,775 | 14,020 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,548 | 2,089 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 20,275 | 26,993 | +33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,937 | 4,103 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 22,496 | 21,267 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,551 | 3,311 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 26,883 | 26,998 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,611 | 4,320 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 23,451 | 24,138 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,659 | 3,979 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 17,946 | 18,434 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,929 | 3,406 | +77% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.