Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Qdrant provides client SDKs for various programming languages, allowing easy integration with Qdrant deployments.
.claude/skills/qdrant-clients-sdk/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Qdrant has the following officially supported client SDKs:
pip install qdrant-client[fastembed]npm install @qdrant/js-client-restcargo add qdrant-clientgo get github.com/qdrant/go-clientdotnet add package Qdrant.ClientAll interaction with Qdrant can happen through the REST API or gRPC API. We recommend using the REST API if you are using Qdrant for the first time or working on a prototype.
To obtain code examples for a specific client and use case, you can send a search request to the library of curated code snippets for the Qdrant client.
bashcurl -X GET "https://snippets.qdrant.tech/search?language=python&query=how+to+upload+points"
Available languages: python, typescript, rust, java, go, csharp
Response example:
markdown## Snippet 1 *qdrant-client* (vlatest) — https://search.qdrant.tech/md/documentation/manage-data/points/ Uploads multiple vector-embedded points to a Qdrant collection using the Python qdrant_client (PointStruct) with id, payload (e.g., color), and a 3D-like vector for similarity search. It supports parallel uploads (parallel=4) and a retry policy (max_retries=3) for robust indexing. The operation is idempotent: re-uploading with the same id overwrites existing points; if ids aren’t provided, Qdrant auto-generates UUIDs. client.upload_points( collection_name="{collection_name}", points=[ models.PointStruct( id=1, payload={ "color": "red", }, vector=[0.9, 0.1, 0.1], ), models.PointStruct( id=2, payload={ "color": "green", }, vector=[0.1, 0.9, 0.1], ), ], parallel=4, max_retries=3, )
Default response format is markdown, if snippet output is required in JSON format, you can add &format=json to the query string.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 22 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +39 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.