Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →qdrant/qdrant-vertical-scaling
Guides Qdrant vertical scaling decisions.
Passed 22 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 12 of 23 without it.
and 9 more in the full report
10 fixed12 passed either way1 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
This benchmark measured an earlier version of the skill.
A newer attempt on gemini-3.8-flash on 10/21/2026 did not produce a publishable comparison (not comparable). The snapshot above is the previously measured run.
One of 10 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Write down the standard memory calculation formula used to estimate full-precision float32 vector memory in Qdrant before index and operational overhead.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Applies the formula num_vectors * dimensions * 4 bytes * 1.5 to calculate unquantized float32 vector memory. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Vertical scaling means increasing CPU, RAM, or disk on existing nodes rather than adding more nodes. This is the recommended first step before considering horizontal scaling. Vertical scaling is simpler and avoids distributed system complexity.
Use when: current node resources (RAM, CPU, disk) are insufficient, but the workload doesn't yet require distribution.
replication_factor: 2 or higher before resizing to maintain availability during the rolling restartImportant: Scaling up is straightforward. Scaling down requires care -- if the working set no longer fits in RAM after downsizing, performance will degrade severely due to cache eviction. Always load test before scaling down.
memory: cold) and the quantized copy stays in RAM. With scalar quantization, the copy is 1/4 the size (INT8 reduces each float32 to 1 byte) Quantizationturbo4 datatype (dense vectors only) divides by ~8 on its own, without needing separate quantization Vector datatypesm: 16) and payload indexes; the WAL counts against disk, not RAM Capacity planningtest cases passed, vs 12 / 23 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.