Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →qierkang/karpathy-guidelines
Make simple, focused, low-risk code changes with explicit assumptions and measurable verification.
Passed 13 of 18 test cases with the skill, and 12 of 18 without it.
and 2 more in the full report
3 fixed13 passed either way5 still failing2 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
This benchmark measured an earlier version of the skill.
A newer attempt on gemini-3.6-flash on 10/4/2026 did not produce a publishable comparison (not comparable). The snapshot above is the previously measured run.
One of 3 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I was handed a bug ticket to modify `payment_gateway.py`. What workspace action should I perform before modifying any files?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Recommends inspecting the working tree status before modifying files. | Missed | Passed |
| Emphasizes preserving unrelated user or agent changes. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Use this skill whenever code or runtime configuration will change. Prefer the simplest implementation that is easy to inspect, test, and remove.
AGENTS.md, the owning package README, and only the files needed for the task.scripts/util-verify-task-scope.py init with the reviewed contract, then check at handoff. See references/task-scope.md.package.json, Docker files, and project scripts first.test cases passed, vs 12 / 18 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.