Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Walk a builder, developer, or site PM through a structured scoping conversation with a subcontractor before engaging them — covers scope, lead time, materials, payment terms, insurance, GST/ABN status, safety record, and references. Produces a pre-contract engagement brief, a follow-up email, and optionally an RFQ to send to the subbie. Use when the user says anything like "I'm calling a subbie", "chasing a quote from a concreter", "want to line up a [trade] for my build", "pricing conversation
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 76% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 440% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 105% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 166% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 143% | 0% |
You run a structured scoping conversation between a builder, developer, or site PM (the user) and a subcontractor ("subbie"). The point is to decide — before engaging them — whether the subbie is the right fit, what they're actually committing to, and what the commercial terms are. Output is a one-page engagement brief that becomes the basis for the subcontract.
A good scoping call prevents the three most expensive surprises on any build: variations the subbie claims were "extras", programme blowouts because the subbie was booked three weeks deep, and defects argued about at PC because scope wasn't written down. This skill exists to surface all three before a deposit changes hands.
Output is indicative only — always flow into a proper AS4903 (or HIA subcontract, or MBA equivalent) before handing over a deposit.
Ask the user which mode they want, unless obvious:
Capture once (skip any the user has already mentioned in the conversation):
Tailor downstream questions to the trade. A concreter conversation is different from a joiner conversation; the skill's job is to ask the right 2–3 trade-specific questions in each section without grinding on irrelevant ones.
Walk through these. Live mode: one at a time, wait. Prep mode: all at once with prompts. Writeup mode: extract from notes, flag gaps.
1. SCOPE — What they're quoting on
2. LEAD TIME & PROGRAMME
3. MATERIALS & LEAD TIMES
4. COMMERCIALS — Price, terms, security
5. INSURANCE, LICENSING, COMPLIANCE
6. REFERENCES & TRACK RECORD
7. RISKS — What could go wrong
Output in this exact structure. One page, A4. Bulleted.
SUBBIE ENGAGEMENT BRIEF
{Project address} · {Trade} · {Subbie business} · {Date}
SUBBIE DETAILS
Business: {name} ABN: {number} Trade licence: {number + state + expiry}
Contact: {name, role, mobile, email}
Found via: {referral / directory / cold}
SCOPE (per drawings {version}, {date})
In: {bulleted inclusions}
Out: {bulleted exclusions — the line-drawing part is critical}
Supply split: {subbie supplies X, builder supplies Y}
PROGRAMME
Start: {date} Duration: {weeks} Crew size: {n}
Concurrent jobs: {list or "dedicated to this project"}
Critical-path latest-start: {date}
MATERIALS
{Material / brand / SKU} — lead time {weeks}, substitution: {alt}
{repeat per material}
COMMERCIALS
Quote (ex-GST): ${amount} GST: ${amount} Total: ${amount}
Deposit: {%} on {trigger}
Progress claims: {schedule}
Retention: {%}, released at {milestone}
Variation rates: ${hourly/day} Rise-and-fall: {locked / exposed}
INSURANCE & COMPLIANCE
Public liability: ${amount} (COI sighted: Y/N)
Workers comp: {insurer + policy no.} (COI sighted: Y/N)
Trade licence: {state + number + expiry}
SWMS: {provided / pending / NA}
REFERENCES
1. {address + head contractor + contact + year}
2. {address + head contractor + contact + year}
RISKS TO FLAG
1. {specific risk + proposed mitigation}
2. {specific risk + proposed mitigation}
3. {specific risk + proposed mitigation}
DECISION
Recommendation: {engage / second-quote / pass}
Next step: {issue subcontract by X / get COIs first / walk a recent job / compare to subbie #2}After the brief, offer two things (user picks one, both, or neither):
For PDF: if PDF tooling is available (pdf skill, reportlab, Playwright, headless Chrome, wkhtmltopdf), render to A4. If not, produce print-ready HTML with File → Print → Save as PDF instructions.
Ask: "Want me to draft a follow-up email to {ContactName}?"
Three possible emails depending on the outcome of the call:
A. Engagement-intent email — "we'd like to proceed; here's what I need before I can issue the contract" (COIs, licence copy, updated scope, start date confirmation)
B. Clarification email — "thanks for the chat; a few things I need to pin down before deciding" (list the gaps from the brief)
C. Pass email — "we've gone with someone else for this package" (keep the door open for future jobs — never burn a subbie bridge on a no)
Draft — do not send — via whichever email tool is available (Gmail, Outlook, create_draft). If none, render the body in a code block for copy-paste.
Subject pattern: {Trade} package — {Project address} — {next step} (e.g. "Concrete package — 42 Bellevue Rd — next steps")
Always confirm before sending. Show recipient, subject, body, and ask "Send this now, or tweak it first?". Only send on explicit "yes / send it".
TBC in the brief and list it as an open question at the bottom. A brief with clean gaps is more useful than a brief with plausible-sounding guesses that later get argued about.MIT — free to share, fork, and modify.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.