Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →refoundai/fixing-underperforming-teams
Help users identify why a team is struggling and implement a structured recovery plan by addressing leadership gaps, individual performance, and structural misalignments.
Passed 20 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 16 of 22 without it.
and 7 more in the full report
6 fixed14 passed either way0 still failing2 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 6 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
My product group has missed its quarterly delivery goals three times in a row. I'm struggling to figure out whether the root issue is individual talent issues, low motivation, or systemic organizational alignment problems. Please provide an evaluation checklist to audit our team setup, a framework to differentiate talent capability from operational friction, and a step-by-step decision matrix on when to coach versus when to move someone off the team.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Audits team setup using the five elements of change framework. | Missed | Passed |
| Evaluates performance using the distinction of can't do, won't do, and not set up to do. | Passed | Passed |
| Applies the enthusiastic rehire test to make talent retention decisions. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Diagnose the root cause of dysfunction and take decisive action to restore high performance.
Help the user with fixing underperforming teams using insights from 12 guests and posts across Lenny's Podcast and Newsletter.
Uri Levine: "Every time that you hire someone new, mark your calendars for 30 days down the road and ask yourself one question, knowing what I know today, would I hire this person? If the answer is no, fire them immediately."
Regularly ask if you would still hire an individual today knowing what you know now. Admitting a hiring mistake early prevents cultural decay.
Anuj Rathi: "There are only three reasons why things do not happen the way you want them to happen as a leader. You can look at a person, and you would say either that person can't do, which is a capability issue, or they won't do, which is a motivation or an alignment issue, or they were not set up to do, which is really your problem that you didn't set up the ways of working now design properly."
Systematically determine if underperformance is a lack of ability (can't do) or a lack of motivation (won't do). This determines whether to coach or move the person.
Bangaly Kaba: "I found this framework travels with me. It's got these five components to it, vision, skills, incentives, resources, action plan, and you need all of those to have change. And then within those buckets you've got to figure out what are the right levers that you need to pull? What are the things that are missing?"
Audit failing initiatives against vision, skills, incentives, resources, and action plans. If any one of these is missing, the turnaround will fail.
Christina Wodtke: "So, I say OKRs are more of a vitamin, they're not a medicine. So, if you take OKRs and you're like, 'Oh, this will fix everything that's wrong with you.' No, that's not going to happen. It's just going to reveal everything that's wrong with your company."
Treat failed OKRs or goals as signals of underlying strategy or safety issues rather than the root problem itself. Verify strategy before blaming the goal-setting process.
From "Five principles for successfully managing managers": "Even though the skip leader subconsciously (or even explicitly) knows that the line manager is struggling, confronting the issue head-on is hard—especially as a new skip. So the natural inclination is to quietly solve the issue themselves, pull double duty by taking on part of the line manager’s job, and then provide cover for the direct-report manager’s performance with others."
Resist the urge to do the work of a struggling manager. Covering for them prevents organizational visibility and stops you from fixing the actual leadership gap.
test cases passed, vs 16 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.