Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →reinamaccredy/gitnexus-exploring
Use when the user asks how code works, wants to understand architecture, trace execution flows, or explore unfamiliar parts of the codebase. Examples: "How does X work?", "What calls this function?", "Show me the auth flow"
Passed 11 of 17 test cases with the skill, and 5 of 17 without it.
and 8 more in the full report
10 fixed4 passed either way6 still failing2 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 10 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I need to inspect all functional areas and their cohesion scores across the `web-api` repository without looking at individual file lines. Which resource URI provides this summary?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Reads the URI gitnexus://repo/web-api/clusters. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
1. READ gitnexus://repos → Discover indexed repos
2. READ gitnexus://repo/{name}/context → Codebase overview, check staleness
3. gitnexus_query({query: "<what you want to understand>"}) → Find related execution flows
4. gitnexus_context({name: "<symbol>"}) → Deep dive on specific symbol
5. READ gitnexus://repo/{name}/process/{name} → Trace full execution flow
If step 2 says "Index is stale" → run
npx gitnexus analyzein terminal.
- [ ] READ gitnexus://repo/{name}/context
- [ ] gitnexus_query for the concept you want to understand
- [ ] Review returned processes (execution flows)
- [ ] gitnexus_context on key symbols for callers/callees
- [ ] READ process resource for full execution traces
- [ ] Read source files for implementation details
| Resource | What you get |
|---|---|
gitnexus://repo/{name}/context | Stats, staleness warning (~150 tokens) |
gitnexus://repo/{name}/clusters | All functional areas with cohesion scores (~300 tokens) |
gitnexus://repo/{name}/cluster/{name} | Area members with file paths (~500 tokens) |
test cases passed, vs 5 / 17 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.