Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Generate submission-ready reports for all confirmed findings. Runs dedup, PoC builder, quality check, and report writer. Usage: /report bounty or /report pentest
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Generate reports for confirmed findings. Format: $ARGUMENTS (default: bounty)
This runs the full reporting pipeline. Run this AFTER /pipeline and /validate.
Run uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/dedup_findings.py --scan-dir scans/ --db findings.json --stats Read findings.md and brain effective techniques. Show the user a numbered list of confirmed findings.
Look in poc/ directory. If no PoC for this finding, launch poc-builder agent: "Create PoC for: finding details]. You MUST write files to poc/<finding-slug>/. Create reproduce.sh and poc.html (if client-side). Do NOT just output to terminal — write the actual files."
Look in evidence/ directory. If no screenshots/recordings exist:
ls before referencing themRead scope.yaml to check the platform: field.
platform: hackerone → use CVSS 3.1 (HackerOne does not support CVSS 4.0)Launch report-writer agent: "Write a bug bounty report for: finding details]. Format: $ARGUMENTS. Platform: platform from scope.yaml]. CVSS version: 3.1 if hackerone, 4.0 otherwise]. CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS:
${HACKERONE_EMAIL_ALIAS} (HackerOne), ${BUGCROWD_EMAIL_ALIAS} (Bugcrowd), ${INTIGRITI_EMAIL_ALIAS} (Intigriti), or ${YESWEHACK_EMAIL} (YesWeHack). Substitution happens at submit time. See rules/identities.md for the full table."Launch quality-check agent on the draft. If score < 7, show issues and ask user if they want to fix and re-check.
After all findings are processed, show:
Reports generated:
1. [title] — score: X/10 — reports/drafts/finding-1.md
2. [title] — score: X/10 — reports/drafts/finding-2.md
...
Ready for submission:
/dupcheck <finding> — check for duplicates
/submit <finding> — submit to platformRun uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/global_brain.py sync-from-local Run uv run python3 $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/tools/statusline.py
A report is ready when a tired triager can reproduce and justify it without guessing.
Hard requirements:
If any confirmed finding lacks PoC or evidence, stop report generation for that finding and send it back to /validate or /chain.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 18 counted toward the lift figure. The other 4 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +64 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 18 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.