Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Reverse engineer Rust-compiled malware using IDA Pro and Ghidra with techniques for handling non-null-terminated strings, crate dependency extraction, and Rust-specific control flow analysis.
.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-rust-malware/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
Rust has become increasingly popular for malware development due to its cross-compilation, memory safety guarantees, and the complexity it introduces for reverse engineers. Rust binaries contain the entire standard library statically linked, producing large binaries with extensive boilerplate code. Key challenges include non-null-terminated strings (Rust uses fat pointers with pointer+length), monomorphization generating duplicated generic code, complex error handling (Result/Option unwrap chains), and unfamiliar calling conventions. Decompiling Rust to C produces unhelpful output compared to C/C++ binaries. Tools like Ghidra scripts for crate extraction, and training focused on Rust-specific patterns (2024-2025) help address these challenges. Notable Rust malware includes BlackCat/ALPHV ransomware, Hive ransomware variants, and Buer Loader.
python#!/usr/bin/env python3 """Analyze Rust malware binary metadata and extract crate dependencies.""" import re import sys import json def identify_rust_binary(data): """Check if binary is Rust-compiled and extract version info.""" indicators = { "rust_panic_strings": bool(re.search(rb'panicked at', data)), "rust_unwrap": bool(re.search(rb'called.*unwrap.*on.*None', data)), "core_panic": bool(re.search(rb'core::panicking', data)), "std_rt": bool(re.search(rb'std::rt::lang_start', data)), "cargo_path": bool(re.search(rb'\.cargo[/\\]registry', data)), "rustc_version": None, } version = re.search(rb'rustc\s+(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)', data) if version: indicators["rustc_version"] = version.group(1).decode() is_rust = sum(1 for v in indicators.values() if v) >= 2 return is_rust, indicators def extract_crates(data): """Extract Rust crate (dependency) names from binary strings.""" crate_pattern = re.compile( rb'(?:crates\.io-[a-f0-9]+/|\.cargo/registry/src/[^/]+/)' rb'([\w-]+)-(\d+\.\d+\.\d+)' ) crates = {} for match in crate_pattern.finditer(data): name = match.group(1).decode() version = match.group(2).decode() crates[name] = version # Also check for common malware-relevant crates suspicious_crates = { "reqwest": "HTTP client", "hyper": "HTTP library", "tokio": "Async runtime", "aes": "AES encryption", "chacha20": "ChaCha20 encryption", "rsa": "RSA encryption", "ring": "Crypto library", "base64": "Base64 encoding", "winapi": "Windows API bindings", "winreg": "Registry access", "sysinfo": "System information", "screenshots": "Screen capture", "clipboard": "Clipboard access", "keylogger": "Key logging", } capabilities = [] for crate_name, description in suspicious_crates.items(): if crate_name in crates: capabilities.append({ "crate": crate_name, "version": crates[crate_name], "capability": description, }) return crates, capabilities def extract_rust_strings(data): """Extract strings handling Rust's non-null-terminated format.""" # Rust strings are stored as pointer+length, but string literals # are often in .rodata as contiguous sequences strings = [] ascii_pattern = re.compile(rb'[\x20-\x7e]{8,500}') for match in ascii_pattern.finditer(data): s = match.group().decode('ascii') # Filter for malware-relevant strings keywords = ['http', 'socket', 'encrypt', 'decrypt', 'shell', 'exec', 'cmd', 'upload', 'download', 'persist', 'registry', 'mutex', 'pipe', 'inject'] if any(kw in s.lower() for kw in keywords): strings.append(s) return strings if __name__ == "__main__": if len(sys.argv) < 2: print(f"Usage: {sys.argv[0]} <rust_binary>") sys.exit(1) with open(sys.argv[1], 'rb') as f: data = f.read() is_rust, indicators = identify_rust_binary(data) print(f"[{'+'if is_rust else '-'}] Rust binary: {is_rust}") print(json.dumps(indicators, indent=2, default=str)) crates, capabilities = extract_crates(data) print(f"\n[+] Crates ({len(crates)}):") for name, ver in sorted(crates.items()): print(f" {name} v{ver}") if capabilities: print(f"\n[!] Suspicious capabilities:") for cap in capabilities: print(f" {cap['crate']} -> {cap['capability']}") strings = extract_rust_strings(data) if strings: print(f"\n[+] Suspicious strings ({len(strings)}):") for s in strings[:20]: print(f" {s}")
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 20 counted toward the lift figure. The other 2 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +18 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 20 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.