See it in action
One of 3 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
PromptEvaluate the external advisor's recommendations on our Dockerfile multi-stage build performance.
What was checked, without and with the skill| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|
| Grounds findings in concrete file, artifact, or command evidence | Missed | Passed |
|---|
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md105 linessingle file
Ask
This is a Hermes-native ask workflow skill.
Why This Exists
ask exists to keep review work explicit, evidence-backed, and inside the Hermes/executor boundary instead of relying on ad hoc chat narration.
Do Not Use When
- The request is casual chat, a status-only acknowledgement, or another workflow has stronger routing evidence.
- The user needs implementation, review, CI, merge, or external publishing evidence that has not been delegated or observed.
Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: ask: ask Claude as an external advisor to critique this plugin bridge plan before implementation.
- Expected behavior: Prepare an advisor prompt, capture the response boundary, and summarize reusable critique.
- Why: The user wants outside review before committing to a direction.
Bad example:
- Prompt: ask: treat casual chat or unaccepted work as if this workflow already produced verified results.
- Expected behavior: Ask a clarification question or route to a narrower workflow instead of forcing
ask.
- Why: The request lacks the required inputs or would overclaim work that Hermes did not observe.
Completion Checklist
- Findings or no-issue results are grounded in concrete file, artifact, command, or source evidence.
- Open questions, residual risk, and missing verification are named.
- Fixes or follow-up work are separate handoffs unless the user explicitly asked to implement them.
Recovery Notes
- If the reviewed target is missing, inspect the requested artifact or ask one target question.
- If independent verification is unavailable, report the gap and avoid an approval-style claim.
Workflow Lane
Track record
Benchmark
11 / 21
test cases passed, vs 11 / 21 without
Adoption
- Users
- 0
- Times used
- 0
Safety and source details
SkillSafety
✓ 3 of 3 passed✓Code scan15 of 15 checks clean
0 critical · 0 warning · 0 info — scanner v5 — 8/17/2026
View 15 scanner checks
live_secretremote_code_executionreverse_shelldata_exfiltrationssrf_metadataagent_snoopinganti_refusaldestructive_commandsobfuscated_unicodeunicode_homoglyphopaque_blobsuspicious_urltool_overreachtrigger_abuseprompt_injection_phrasing
✓IntentSafe
LLM judge · does the skill do what it claims
✓ContentClean
LLM judge · policy & harmful-content review
Source
ImportedLicense MITImported 8/17/2026Version v2