Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →runtsang/rebuttal-self-review
Systematic quality check for a completed rebuttal document before submission. Use after Stage 3 document compilation or after Stage 5 final remarks writing to verify completeness, tone, factual accuracy, and structural integrity. Catches common rebuttal errors before they reach reviewers.
Passed 22 of 24 test cases with the skill, and 16 of 24 without it.
and 7 more in the full report
7 fixed15 passed either way1 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
RebuttalStudio Utility — Pre-Submission Check Run this skill after Stage 3 or Stage 5 document generation, before copying the final text into OpenReview or the submission portal. It catches structural gaps, tone issues, and factual risks that stage-specific skills may have missed.
A systematic quality assurance checklist tailored for academic conference rebuttals (ICLR, ICML, NeurIPS, and similar venues).
Unlike a paper, a rebuttal has a strict deadline, tight word limits, and must directly engage with specific reviewer concerns. This review process is optimized for those constraints: fast, targeted, and submission-ready focused.
Recommended timing:
The most common rebuttal failure is missing a reviewer concern.
Coverage Check:
- [ ] Count the total issues in Stage 1 breakdown for each reviewer
- [ ] Confirm each issue appears in the Stage 3 document
- [ ] For multi-round reviewers, confirm each follow-up was answered
- [ ] No reviewer's comment was silently dropped
- [ ] If an issue was not addressed, a reason is stated ("We will address this in the revision")
Tone Check:
- [ ] Opening of each reviewer section thanks the reviewer
test cases passed, vs 16 / 24 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.