Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Add descriptions for new models from the HuggingFace router to chat-ui configuration. Use when new models are released on the router and need descriptions added to prod.yaml and dev.yaml. Triggers on requests like "add new model descriptions", "update models from router", "sync models", or when explicitly invoking /add-model-descriptions.
.claude/skills/ruvnet-add-model-descriptions/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -57% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -38% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -44% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -55% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -35% | 0% |
Add descriptions for new models available in the HuggingFace router to chat-ui's prod.yaml and dev.yaml.
WebFetch https://router.huggingface.co/v1/models
Extract all model IDs from the response.
chart/env/prod.yamlMODELS JSON array in envVarsCompare router models with prod.yaml. Missing = in router but not in prod.yaml.
For each missing model, search the web for its specifications:
Match existing style:
Examples:
"Flagship GLM MoE for coding, reasoning, and agentic tool use.""MoE agent model with multilingual coding and fast outputs.""Vision-language Qwen for documents, GUI agents, and visual reasoning.""Mobile agent for multilingual Android device automation."Add new models at the TOP of the MODELS array in:
chart/env/prod.yamlchart/env/dev.yamlFormat:
json { "id": "org/model-name", "description": "Description here." }
git add chart/env/prod.yaml chart/env/dev.yaml git commit -m "feat: add descriptions for N new models from router"
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 14,948 | 4,664 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,585 | 940 | -74% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 14,286 | 4,122 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,448 | 923 | -73% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 19,655 | 4,243 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,246 | 907 | -79% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 5,104 | 1,378 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,165 | 725 | -38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 8,327 | 1,464 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,829 | 785 | -57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 6,983 | 1,360 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,209 | 745 | -38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 10,979 | 3,502 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,294 | 1,288 | -44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 9,886 | 1,767 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,827 | 821 | -55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 9,249 | 2,253 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,692 | 968 | -43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 11,787 | 3,680 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,612 | 1,281 | -51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 12,532 | 6,031 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,154 | 1,688 | -22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 10,465 | 6,333 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,013 | 1,783 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 12,370 | 2,140 | -83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,026 | 879 | -57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 6,276 | 1,633 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,250 | 812 | -35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 7,097 | 1,205 | -83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,272 | 765 | -40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 8,389 | 3,552 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,470 | 1,091 | -26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 17,989 | 3,218 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,355 | 1,232 | -63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 11,556 | 6,660 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,281 | 1,736 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→fail | 7,628 | 1,354 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,445 | 756 | -48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 8,451 | 3,458 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,659 | 1,112 | -33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 10,818 | 5,568 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,052 | 1,631 | -21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 7,068 | 5,896 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,528 | 1,768 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→fail | 6,246 | 2,971 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,251 | 1,144 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 20 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +35 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 20 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.