Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Run the SPARC Specification phase — gather requirements, define acceptance criteria, identify constraints, and store the spec in memory
.claude/skills/ruvnet-sparc-spec/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 392% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -48% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -15% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -47% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -65% | 0% |
Run Phase 1 of the SPARC methodology: define what must be built and how success is measured.
When starting a new feature or project that needs structured requirements gathering before any code is written. This phase produces the foundational specification that all subsequent phases (Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) build upon.
mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__hooks_intelligence_trajectory-start with metadata { "phase": "specification", "feature": "$ARGUMENTS" }mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_search with namespace sparc-state and query for the feature to see if a SPARC workflow already exists. If it does, retrieve existing artifacts. If not, initialize state with phase 1.mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__neural_predict with the feature description to find relevant past specifications and learned patterns AC-1: Given [precondition], when [action], then [expected result] AC-2: Given [precondition], when [action], then [expected result] AC-3: Given [precondition], when [action], then [expected result]
mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_store with:sparc-phasesspec-{feature-slug}{ status: "complete", requirements, acceptanceCriteria, constraints, edgeCases, integrationPoints }mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_store with:sparc-statecurrent-phase-{feature-slug}mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__hooks_intelligence_trajectory-step with the specification summary/sparc advance to pass the gate and move to the Pseudocode phase# Specification: {Feature Name}
## Requirements
### Functional
- FR-1: ...
- FR-2: ...
### Non-Functional
- NFR-1: ...
## Acceptance Criteria
- AC-1: Given ..., when ..., then ...
- AC-2: Given ..., when ..., then ...
- AC-3: Given ..., when ..., then ...
## Constraints
- Performance: ...
- Security: ...
- Compatibility: ...
## Edge Cases
- EC-1: ...
- EC-2: ...
- EC-3: ...
## Integration Points
- IP-1: ...
---
Phase 1 complete. Run `/sparc advance` to pass the gate check.| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-02 | fail→fail | 15,892 | 21,449 | +35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,803 | 4,252 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 16,494 | 18,061 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,534 | 3,759 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | 23,855 | 19,477 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,669 | 4,455 | -5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 16,190 | 6,216 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,103 | 1,434 | -54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 20,799 | 7,591 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,440 | 1,428 | -58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→fail | 12,013 | 8,774 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,415 | 1,254 | -48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→fail | 7,650 | 5,649 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,602 | 1,365 | -15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 6,299 | 22,476 | +257% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,189 | 5,853 | +392% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 14,997 | 18,850 | +26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,371 | 4,355 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 13,546 | 6,914 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,184 | 1,572 | -51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 17,917 | 6,305 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,338 | 1,454 | -56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | 8,210 | 6,214 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,518 | 1,315 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | 12,788 | 6,131 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,603 | 1,388 | -47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→fail | 14,590 | 6,080 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,676 | 1,419 | -47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 11,056 | 10,989 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,402 | 3,168 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 11,175 | 12,581 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,072 | 3,222 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | 8,603 | 6,632 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,805 | 1,499 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→fail | 21,338 | 6,758 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,431 | 1,538 | -65% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | 20,597 | 7,607 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,940 | 1,453 | -63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 11,636 | 22,980 | +97% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,212 | 5,501 | +149% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 17,165 | 8,159 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,398 | 1,638 | -52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 22,151 | 6,768 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,257 | 1,457 | -66% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 8 counted toward the lift figure. The other 14 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of -14 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 8 comparable cases. 7 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.