Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Embed hierarchical data via npx ruvector@0.2.25 embed text and project into the Poincare ball in user code (no --model poincare flag in 0.2.25)
.claude/skills/ruvnet-vector-hyperbolic/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -42% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -37% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -66% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -28% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -40% | 0% |
Embed hierarchical data in the Poincare ball model using ruvector.
Use this skill when your data has inherent hierarchy — dependency trees, module structures, taxonomies, org charts, ontologies. Hyperbolic space captures hierarchical distances with far fewer dimensions than Euclidean embeddings.
bash npm ls ruvector 2>/dev/null | grep '0.2.25' || npm install ruvector@0.2.25
--model poincare flag on embed text):bash npx -y ruvector@0.2.25 embed text "hierarchical concept" -o concept.vec.json
bash npx -y ruvector@0.2.25 embed neural --help For an ad-hoc projection, normalize the 384-dim vector to live inside the unit ball (x_i / (||x|| * (1 + epsilon))) and persist the projected coordinates alongside the original embedding.
d(u, v) = arcosh(1 + 2 * ||u-v||^2 / ((1-||u||^2)(1-||v||^2)))Distance grows logarithmically with tree depth, preserving hierarchy.
mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_store({ key: "hyperbolic-CONCEPT", value: "COORDINATES_AND_NEIGHBORS", namespace: "hyperbolic-embeddings" })
| Property | Meaning | |----------|---------| | Norm close to 0 | Generic, root-level concept | | Norm close to 1 | Specific, leaf-level concept | | Small geodesic distance | Closely related in hierarchy | | Large geodesic distance | Distant or different subtrees |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 18,987 | 18,401 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,954 | 4,592 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 20,117 | 56,097 | +179% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,322 | 6,322 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 12,998 | 8,378 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,635 | 1,262 | -52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 10,134 | 2,801 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,002 | 1,166 | -42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 10,252 | 2,746 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,840 | 1,167 | -37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 30,821 | 1,485 | -95% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,578 | 878 | -66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 13,183 | 5,067 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,282 | 1,641 | -28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 11,333 | 3,914 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,277 | 1,360 | -40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 10,421 | 1,679 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,916 | 830 | -57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 8,362 | 3,589 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,848 | 1,414 | -23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 8,676 | 1,809 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,601 | 937 | -41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 10,436 | 2,733 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,777 | 1,128 | -37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 7,732 | 2,821 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,428 | 1,092 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 6,831 | 2,639 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,280 | 1,098 | -14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | 13,456 | 8,708 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,416 | 2,140 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 13,434 | 3,897 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,422 | 1,340 | -45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 9,500 | 1,691 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,605 | 868 | -46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 9,883 | 4,819 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,605 | 1,345 | -16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 13,497 | 11,549 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,300 | 2,633 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 12,695 | 7,711 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,671 | 1,944 | -27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 19,807 | 22,191 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,509 | 5,624 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 22,266 | 11,873 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,411 | 2,952 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 19 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +45 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 19 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.