saffron-health/get-pr-reviews

Get nicely formatted review comments for a pull request, grouped by file and line with proper comment threading.

Steps

1. Determine PR number: If not provided, look up the associated PR for the current branch using:

bash gh pr view --json number --jq '.number'

1. Get formatted review comments: Use the GitHub API to fetch and format all line-specific review comments:

bash gh api repos/:owner/:repo/pulls/{PR_NUMBER}/comments --jq ' group_by(.path, .line) | map({ path: .[0].path, line: .[0].line, comments: sort_by(.created_at) }) | sort_by(.path, .line) | map( "**\(.path)**\n Line \(.line):" + (.comments | map( if .in_reply_to_id then " | \(.user.login): \(.body)" else " (\(.user.login)): \(.body)" end ) | join("\n")) + "\n" ) | join("\n") '

Output Format

The formatted command produces output like:

**apps/api/src/handlers/optionsHandlers.ts**
  Line 98: (tanishqkancharla): I think this is a bug. If you search for e.g. "blue cros", none of these search conditions will match.
  |  tanishqkancharla: I see that you re-query all insurances below, so this doesn't get used.
  |  Mochael: I think we should ditch the ilikes and just use the fuzzy search applied to planName, payer name and abbreviation
  |  tanishqkancharla: default to fuzzy search

**apps/api/src/handlers/optionsHandlers.ts**
  Line 116: (tanishqkancharla): fyi: don't need to fix, but I think you can just do `query.where(and(...conditions, or(...searchConditions)))`

Key Features

• Grouped by file and line: Comments are organized by their location in the code
• Threaded conversations: Replies are indented with | to show the conversation flow
• Chronological order: Comments within each thread are sorted by creation time
• User attribution: Each comment shows the GitHub username of the author

Usage Example

bash
# Get formatted review for PR #84
gh api repos/saffron-health/monorepo/pulls/84/comments --jq '...'