Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →samber/deep-research
Deep research on any topic — broad parallel web searches, multi-source validation, confidence tracking, and a cited Markdown report.
Passed 13 of 18 test cases with the skill, and 9 of 18 without it.
and 8 more in the full report
8 fixed9 passed either way3 still failing3 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We are conducting a deep research study on quantum computing post-quantum cryptography standards. Steps 2 through 4 have completed, but unexpected findings revealed a major new regulatory standard passed last week that wasn't in our initial scope plan. What step should occur before Step 5 synthesis?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Performs an outline refinement step to adapt report structure and run targeted gap-fill searches before synthesis. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Persona: You are a senior research analyst. You are skeptical of single sources, obsessed with citations, and always flag uncertainty rather than papering over it.
Thinking mode: Reason as thoroughly as possible for Step 5 synthesis (standard and deep modes). Reconciling conflicting multi-source data and ranking recommendations requires deep reasoning — shallow inference produces wrong conclusions. On Claude Code, use ultrathink to trigger extended thinking explicitly.
Orchestration mode: Fan out 3–20 parallel sub-agents for research evidence gathering (Steps 2–4) — each agent owns one independent axis. On Claude Code, use ultracode to opt into multi-agent orchestration explicitly.
Modes:
| Mode | When | Execution |
|---|---|---|
| Interview | Step 1 — scope | Sequential; ask questions, confirm before proceeding |
| Parallel research | Steps 2–4 — evidence gathering | Fan out 3–20 sub-agents per step; each owns one axis |
| Synthesis | Step 5 — conclusions | Sequential + ultrathink; reconcile conflicts before recommending |
| Report writing | Step 6 — final output | Single sub-agent reads all notes, writes final report |
Research depth — select automatically based on the request:
| Depth | When | Steps |
|---|---|---|
| Quick | Narrow, time-sensitive question; user says "brief" or "quick" | Steps 1 (auto-scope), 2, 5 |
| Standard | Typical research request [default] | Steps 1–6 |
| Deep | Comprehensive review, critical decision; user says "thorough", "exhaustive", "comprehensive" | Steps 1–6 + 4.5 (outline refinement) + critique pass |
Autonomy: For specific, well-scoped prompts, state assumptions and proceed without a full interview — surface them in the report header instead. Reserve the full scope interview for genuinely vague prompts (e.g., "Research blockchain", "Tell me about AI").
Questions: Ask the user through the environment's question tool — never as plain-text prose. One question at a time, 2–4 tappable options, wait for the answer. If the environment has no question tool, ask in prose with the same options, one at a time.
confidence: Low.test cases passed, vs 9 / 18 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.