Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →SAP BTP Cloud Integration Automation Service (CIAS) skill for guided integration workflows. Use when: setting up CIAS subscriptions, configuring destinations, assigning roles (CIASIntegrationAdministrator, CIASIntegrationExpert, CIASIntegrationMonitor), planning integration scenarios, working with My Inbox tasks, monitoring scenario execution, troubleshooting CIAS errors, creating OAuth2 instances, configuring identity providers for CIAS, understanding CIAS security architecture, or integrating
.claude/skills/secondsky-sap-btp-cias/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 91% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 72% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 67% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 133% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 297% | 0% |
Cloud Integration Automation Service provides guided workflows to integrate SAP cloud solutions with on-premise and other SAP cloud solutions. It offers both manual task instructions and automated configuration capabilities.
Use this skill when subscribing to CIAS, assigning CIAS role collections, planning guided integration scenarios, working My Inbox tasks, monitoring scenario execution, configuring OAuth2 API access, or troubleshooting CIAS workflow/task failures.
| Plan | Type | Purpose | |------|------|---------| | Standard | Application | UI access for scenario planning, task monitoring, integration management | | OAuth2 | Service | API access for programmatic operations (required for ABAP automation) |
| Role | Collection | Capabilities | |------|------------|--------------| | Integration Administrator | CIASIntegrationAdministrator | Full access: Plan for Integration, My Inbox, Monitoring; terminate scenarios | | Integration Expert | CIASIntegrationExpert | My Inbox access; work on assigned tasks | | Integration Monitor | CIASIntegrationMonitor | Read-only access to Scenario Execution Monitoring |
AWS: EU10 (Frankfurt), EU11 (Frankfurt EU Access), US10 (Virginia), AP10 (Sydney), JP10 (Tokyo), CA10 (Montreal) Azure: EU20 (Netherlands), CN20 (China North 3) Alibaba: CN40 (Shanghai)
CIASIntegrationAdministrator)> Multiple users can be assigned per role using comma-separated user IDs.
> Always use HTTPS for secure communication.
BC-INS-CIT-RT)CIAS comprises six core components:
Security features:
Symptom: Destination dropdown shows no options during task execution.
Cause: No destinations exist matching the tenant's Host Base URL.
Solution:
Symptom: Cannot proceed with task; execution lock activated.
Cause: Multiple integration workflows exist with identical system components.
Solutions:
Symptom: Users cannot access CIAS application after identity provider change.
Cause: Users not managed by newly configured identity provider.
Solution:
Symptom: Cannot claim task; shows "Reserved" status.
Cause: Another assigned user has already claimed the task.
Solution: Coordinate with team; only one user can work on claimed task at a time.
| Issue Type | Component | Action | |------------|-----------|--------| | General CIAS support | BC-INS-CIT-RT | Create support ticket | | Manual task instructions | Check Support Information tab | Submit incident to listed component | | Data deletion request | BC-INS-CIT-RT | Include email ID and subaccount name | | Service availability | Consumer account | Check Service Availability feature |
For programmatic access (required for ABAP automation):
With mTLS (Certificate):
json{ "xsuaa": { "credential-type": "x509", "x509": { "key-length": 2048, "validity": 365, "validity-type": "DAYS" } } }
Without Certificate: Create with name only.
Use generated client ID and client secret to create OAuth JWT token for API authentication.
| Term | Definition | |------|------------| | Personal Data | Any information relating to identified/identifiable natural person | | Sensitive Personal Data | Racial/ethnic origin, political opinions, religious beliefs, genetic/biometric data | | Residence Period | Time between business end and end-of-purpose when data remains accessible | | Retention Period | Time from last business activity through data deletion | | Blocking | Restricting access to data whose primary business purpose has ended |
| Control | Function | |---------|----------| | Refresh | Update automation statuses | | Expand All | Show all parameter panels | | Collapse All | Hide all parameter panels | | Show/Hide Read-Only Parameters | Toggle read-only visibility | | Save Parameters | Preserve current values | | Logs | View execution records | | Information | Parameter descriptions | | Execute Step | Run automation (async) |
After automation failure:
references/setup-guide.md - Complete subscription, OAuth2, and destination configuration proceduresreferences/security-guide.md - Security architecture, identity provider configuration, and role managementreferences/integration-scenarios.md - Full list of 100+ supported integration scenarios with codes (1M1, 22K, 4A1, etc.)references/troubleshooting.md - Detailed error resolution procedures and common issuesreferences/maintenance-planner.md - Maintenance Planner integration guide and workflow invocationreferences/task-ui-guide.md - Complete task UI controls, tabs, behaviors, and automation stepsreferences/whats-new.md - Complete release notes from 2021-2025 with feature updatestemplates/destination-config.md - Destination configuration templates by target system typetemplates/role-assignment.md - Role assignment procedures and checklists for different scenariosPrimary:
Related:
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 15,942 | 12,886 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,782 | 5,322 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 19,027 | 15,945 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,113 | 5,350 | +72% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 19,823 | 16,165 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,482 | 5,813 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 15,970 | 13,163 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,682 | 4,985 | +86% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 17,290 | 17,359 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,978 | 5,884 | +98% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 13,561 | 12,456 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,141 | 4,863 | +127% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 9,165 | 4,012 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,387 | 3,502 | +152% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 10,132 | 3,738 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,464 | 3,407 | +133% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 5,266 | 3,038 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 832 | 3,306 | +297% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 9,889 | 3,074 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,591 | 3,393 | +113% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 11,352 | 3,851 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,704 | 3,555 | +109% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 7,886 | 2,779 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,264 | 3,348 | +165% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 7,702 | 2,948 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,155 | 3,294 | +185% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 10,357 | 5,725 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,622 | 3,779 | +133% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 12,418 | 9,160 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,008 | 4,380 | +118% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 13,345 | 4,508 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,843 | 3,601 | +95% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 10,470 | 4,404 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,599 | 3,589 | +124% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 8,675 | 5,366 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,403 | 3,703 | +164% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 12,569 | 3,525 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,360 | 3,479 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 11,225 | 3,256 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,712 | 3,337 | +95% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 8,060 | 3,617 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,217 | 3,469 | +185% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 5,619 | 3,448 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 806 | 3,363 | +317% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +64 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.